Bicycle Frame Rear Triangle Deformable Suspension

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional bicycle frames with rear suspension systems featuring multiple points of rotation are heavy due to complex articulated areas, which negatively impact cyclist performance, and attempts to reduce weight by using deformable components often compromise lateral stiffness and energy efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A bicycle frame with a rear triangle that can deform in two directions with minimal difference in maximum deformation, allowing the removal of the pivot point at the rear wheel axle, distributing deformation along the strut's length to maintain stiffness and reduce weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional rear suspension systems with multiple points of rotation are used, then the suspension mechanism works effectively, but the frame weight increases due to complex articulated areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension mechanism functionalityVSAvoidframe weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the pivot point from the rear wheel axle area, extracting this complex articulated element from the suspension system. The rear triangle is designed to deform elastically without requiring a rotational pivot at the wheel axle, thereby reducing frame weight while maintaining suspension functionality through the remaining pivot points and the deformable rear triangle structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The rear triangle is designed with specific geometric parameters and material properties that allow it to deform elastically under vertical loads. By carefully controlling the dimensions, cross-sectional area, and material characteristics of the rear triangle, the system achieves the desired suspension effect through controlled deformation rather than through additional pivot points

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Weight of moving object

If deformable components are used to reduce frame weight, then frame weight decreases, but lateral stiffness and energy efficiency are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe weightVSAvoidlateral stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The deformable rear triangle is designed with non-uniform cross-sectional properties along its length, with thicker sections at critical locations to maintain lateral stiffness and thinner sections where deformation is desired. This localized variation in structural properties allows the frame to be lightweight overall while maintaining necessary stiffness in specific regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The rear triangle can be constructed using composite materials that provide high strength-to-weight ratio and controlled elastic deformation characteristics. These composite structures enable the rear triangle to deform vertically for suspension while maintaining lateral stiffness through the inherent properties of the composite material construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of operation

If excessive deformation is applied to the frame base, then suspension stroke is achieved, but the structure suffers excessive duress and stiffness is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension strokeVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The rear triangle is designed as a dynamic elastic structure that adapts its deformation characteristics based on the applied load. During normal suspension operation, it deforms within elastic limits to provide smooth stroke. The system dynamically adjusts the distribution of deformation across the rear triangle members based on riding conditions, preventing excessive localized stress while maintaining suspension effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design achieves a better stiffness-to-weight ratio and optimal rear suspension operation with reduced weight and minimal duress on the frame structure, requiring less force for suspension stroke, thus enhancing cycling performance.

Implementation Method 1

a rear triangle (3) capable of being deformed, wherein, in the complete transition of the suspension system, it is capable of adopting at least the following positions: an initial position, in which it presents an absence of deformation, a first intermediate position, in which it presents a maximum deformation in a first direction, a second intermediate position, in which it presents an absence of deformation, and a final position, in which it presents a maximum deformation in a second direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2698310B1Bicycle frame with deformable rear suspension
Publication Date: 2018.05.16 ORBEA
  • EP2698310B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2698310B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

Frame (1) for a bicycle with a rear suspension system with at least one deformable rear triangle (3) that is capable of adopting at least the following positions: an initial position with an absence of deformation, a first intermediate position in which the rear triangle (3) presents a maximum deformation in a first direction (d1), a second intermediate position with an absence of deformation, and a final position in which the rear triangle (3) presents a maximum deformation in a second direction (d2). The maximum deformation in both directions (d1, d2) is similar, thereby ensuring that the frame (1) is deformed minimally along the complete stroke of the suspension, which guarantees the optimal stiffness of the frame (1).