Bicycle Rim Alternating Projections for Tire Clinching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional clincher bicycle rims have low tire clinching force, especially at low air pressure or under lateral force, but increasing the size of projecting edges for better clinching power complicates tire installation and removal.

Innovation Solution

A bicycle rim design featuring an annular bridge with alternating first and second projections of different sizes along the tire support surface, maintaining ease of assembly while enhancing tire clinching power.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the projecting edges are made bigger (wider width and/or higher height), then the tire clinching (holding) power (force) is improved, but the difficulty to attach and/or detach the tire from the wheel rim increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetire clinching forceVSAvoidease of tire installation
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The projecting edge is segmented into multiple portions (first portion, second portion, third portion) with different heights along the circumference. This segmentation allows different sections to serve different functions: taller portions provide enhanced clinching force while shorter portions facilitate easier tire installation and removal, thereby resolving the contradiction between holding power and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the projecting edge are given different local qualities (heights) to optimize specific functions at different locations. The first portion has a greater height for strong tire retention, while the second and third portions have reduced heights to ease installation and removal. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by providing both strong holding force and ease of operation at appropriate locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Force

If the projecting edges are made bigger (wider width and/or higher height), then the tire clinching (holding) power (force) is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetire clinching forceVSAvoidrim structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The projecting edge is divided into multiple segments with different heights rather than creating a completely new complex structure. This segmentation approach increases clinching force through strategic height variations while maintaining relative structural simplicity by using a modular, repetitive pattern around the rim circumference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The projecting edge employs asymmetric height variations (first portion taller than second and third portions) to optimize clinching force distribution. This asymmetric design provides enhanced holding power where needed while avoiding unnecessary symmetry that would increase complexity, thereby resolving the contradiction between force and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS9321307B2Bicycle rim
Publication Date: 2016.04.26 SHIMANO INC
  • US9321307B2 patent drawing
  • US9321307B2 patent drawing
  • US9321307B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bicycle rim includes a first annular side wall, a second annular side wall and an annular bridge extending between the first and second annular side walls. The annular bridge has an annular tire support surface extending between the first and second annular sidewalls. The annular tire support surface has a first projection. The first projection has at least one first portion and at least one second portion. The second portion has a different size from the first portion.