Bile Acid Derivative Synthesis via Segmented Grignard and Oxidative Cleavage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current synthetic routes for producing a compound of formula I are inefficient, requiring multiple steps and resulting in low yields, making large-scale industrial production challenging.

Innovation Solution

A 4-step or 6-step process is developed, involving specific chemical transformations such as Grignard reactions, oxidative cleavage, reduction, and sulfonation, which improves yield and reduces the number of steps compared to existing methods, allowing for commercial-scale production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If current synthetic routes are used, then the compound can be produced, but the yield is low and the number of steps is high

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveyieldVSAvoidnumber of steps
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The synthesis route is divided into distinct functional segments: (1) protection of hydroxy groups, (2) Grignard reaction for ring formation, (3) oxidative cleavage of double bond, (4) reduction of carboxylic acid, and (5) sulfonation. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized independently, achieving high overall yield while maintaining manageable complexity through systematic organization of transformations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Hydroxy groups are protected at the beginning of the synthesis sequence before subsequent transformations. This preliminary protection prevents unwanted side reactions during Grignard reaction and oxidative cleavage steps, ensuring high yield by preserving the integrity of functional groups that would otherwise interfere with later reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If current synthetic routes are used, then the compound can be produced, but the process is inefficient for large-scale production

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelarge-scale production capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The synthesis employs parameter optimizations including: (1) selection of specific protecting groups that facilitate high-yield deprotection, (2) control of oxidative cleavage conditions to prevent over-oxidation, (3) optimization of reduction conditions for complete conversion, and (4) selection of sulfonating agents that provide high yields. These parameter changes collectively enable efficient large-scale production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The synthesis route is designed with continuous productive transformations where each step builds upon the previous one without unnecessary interruptions. The protected intermediate undergoes sequential transformations (Grignard reaction → oxidative cleavage → reduction → sulfonation) in a continuous flow of useful chemical actions, maximizing manufacturing efficiency for scale-up.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Adaptability or versatility

If current synthetic routes are used, then the compound can be produced, but different methodologies and bond forming/breaking steps are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemethodology flexibilityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protected intermediate serves multiple functions throughout the synthesis: it protects hydroxy groups during Grignard reaction, enables subsequent oxidative cleavage, and provides a stable platform for reduction and sulfonation. This multi-functionality of the protected intermediate structure allows diverse transformations to proceed from a single versatile platform, achieving adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The new process achieves a significantly higher yield of at least 46%, enabling large-scale industrial synthesis of the compound, compared to the approximately 7% yield of existing methods, while utilizing different methodologies and bond forming/breaking steps.

Implementation Method 1

Grignard reaction to form a compound of formula 3A

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGrignard reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

oxidative cleavage of the double bond of a compound of formula 3A

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidative cleavage: Oxidation

Implementation Method 3

reduction of the C23 carboxylic acid of a compound of formula 4A

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 4

sulfonation of the C23 hydroxy group of a compound of formula 5A

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSulfonation: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS9777038B2Process for preparing bile acid derivatives
Publication Date: 2017.10.03 INTERCEPT PHARMACEUTICALS INC
  • US9777038B2 patent drawing
  • US9777038B2 patent drawing
  • US9777038B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to processes for preparing compounds of formula I:or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or solvate thereof.