Bipolar Electrosurgery Actuator Integrating Switch into Forceps Handle

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing bipolar electrosurgery systems face challenges in efficiently actuating a heating current due to the inconvenient location of the foot pedal controller, leading to delays and risks during surgery, as well as clutter and safety issues from additional cables.

Innovation Solution

A system with an actuator assembly that includes a switch and lever arm, allowing for selective actuation of the heating current through a surgical tool, eliminating the need for a separate pedal controller by integrating the actuation component directly into the tool or power cord, enabling convenient and reliable operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a foot pedal controller is used to actuate the heating current, then the surgeon can control the bipolar generator, but the pedal location is often not aligned with the surgeon's foot requiring groping or body contortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepedal controller accessibilityVSAvoidsurgical safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The actuation function is extracted from the foot pedal controller and integrated directly into the bipolar forceps handle. The surgeon can now activate the heating current by squeezing the forceps handles together, eliminating the need to reach for or grope for a separately located pedal controller.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The actuation mechanism is merged with the forceps handling operation itself. The same hand motion used to grasp and manipulate the tissue with the forceps also activates the heating current, combining two separate actions into one unified operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If a foot pedal controller is used, then the heating current can be actuated, but additional cables and clutter are introduced creating safety risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating current controlVSAvoidcable clutter and tripping hazard
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The separate pedal control line is extracted and eliminated. Control is transferred to the integrated switch mechanism within the forceps handle, removing the additional cable that creates clutter and tripping hazards in the operating room.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The control function is merged into the existing forceps structure and power cord connection. The actuation switch is incorporated into the handle assembly, eliminating the need for a separate control cable between the generator and the surgical tool.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the surgeon moves to another standing position, then the surgeon can work more comfortably, but the location of the pedal controller may no longer be reliably known

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgeon positioning flexibilityVSAvoidpedal controller accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The dependency on a fixed pedal location is extracted and eliminated. The actuation function travels with the forceps handle itself, allowing the surgeon to move freely without concern for maintaining access to a stationary control pedal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The forceps handle provides its own actuation mechanism, making the system self-contained. The surgeon does not need to reference or return to a externally located pedal; the control function is embedded in the tool being used.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If a surgeon's assistant moves the pedal controller to the surgeon's foot, then accessibility is improved, but delay is added to the surgery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepedal controller accessibilityVSAvoidsurgical delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The actuation function is preliminarily integrated into the forceps handle before surgery begins. This eliminates the need for any intraoperative adjustment or repositioning of a separate pedal controller by the surgeon's assistant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The bipolar forceps system is self-configuring with the actuation switch already positioned in the handle. No external intervention or assistant is needed to set up or adjust the control mechanism during the surgical procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3148466B1Bipolar electrosurgery actuator
Publication Date: 2022.07.27 BIPAD INC
  • EP3148466B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3148466B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP3148466B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

A system for selectively actuating a heating current conductible from a bipolar generator to a surgical tool may comprise and actuator assembly having an output receptacle, an input plug, and an actuating component. The output receptacle may be configured to receive a complementary tool plus of the surgical tool. The input plug may be configured for mating with a generator receptacle receivable of the heating current from the bipolar generator. The generator receptacle may be complimentary to the tool plug. The actuating component may have at least one of a switch and a lever arm and may be configured to communicate with the bipolar generator for selectively actuating the heating current to flow from the input plug to the output receptacle upon engagement of the switch of the lever arm.