Bistatic Sensor Pattern Detection for Robot Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic devices face challenges in safely navigating environments with obstacles and people, as existing technologies lack effective methods for real-time object detection and adaptive control to prevent collisions.

Innovation Solution

A bistatic sensor apparatus with a transmitter and receiver component, configured to project and detect patterns using carrier waves, allowing for real-time object detection and adaptive control by analyzing reflected patterns to adjust robotic navigation and communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a robotic device operates in environments with obstacles and people, then the device can perform useful tasks, but the risk of collision and safety hazards increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational capabilityVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary object detection by projecting patterns and analyzing reflected carrier waves before the robotic device moves into potential collision zones. This advance detection allows the device to plan safe trajectories and avoid obstacles and people proactively rather than reactively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the environment by detecting reflected patterns from carrier waves and provides real-time feedback about object positions. This feedback loop enables dynamic adjustment of the robotic device's navigation to maintain safe operation in changing environments with obstacles and people.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If real-time object detection is implemented, then collision avoidance capability is improved, but system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical sensing systems with an optical/electromagnetic approach using carrier waves and pattern detection. This substitution achieves real-time object detection with reduced mechanical complexity by utilizing wave propagation and reflection characteristics instead of physical sensors arrays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a simplified representation of the environment by detecting patterns in reflected carrier waves. Instead of processing raw sensory data from multiple complex sensors, the system analyzes pattern distortions in the reflected waves, which provides sufficient information for collision avoidance with lower computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If the robotic device adapts its trajectory in real-time, then safety is improved, but response time and control complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously maintains an updated model of the environment by constantly detecting reflected patterns, so when obstacles or people are detected, the trajectory adjustment can be made immediately without additional processing delay. The preliminary continuous monitoring eliminates the need for periodic scanning delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic trajectory adaptation where the robotic device continuously adjusts its path based on real-time detected object positions. The control system modifies navigation parameters on-the-fly rather than using pre-planned static paths, enabling responsive safety adjustments while maintaining efficient motion through optimized dynamic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables robotic devices to safely navigate environments by detecting objects and adapting their trajectory to avoid collisions, improving operational efficiency and safety in dynamic settings.

Implementation Method 1

a transmitter component configured to project a pattern by irradiating a portion of an environment using a carrier wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a detector component configured to detect a reflected pattern of the carrier wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS9873196B2Bistatic object detection apparatus and methods
Publication Date: 2018.01.23 BRAIN CORP
  • US9873196B2 patent drawing
  • US9873196B2 patent drawing
  • US9873196B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods for navigation of a robotic device configured to operate in an environment comprising objects and/or persons. Location of objects and/or persons may change prior and/or during operation of the robot. In one embodiment, a bistatic sensor comprises a transmitter and a receiver. The receiver may be spatially displaced from the transmitter. The transmitter may project a pattern on a surface in the direction of robot movement. In one variant, the pattern comprises an encoded portion and an information portion. The information portion may be used to communicate information related to robot movement to one or more persons. The encoded portion may be used to determine presence of one or more object in the path of the robot. The receiver may sample a reflected pattern and compare it with the transmitted pattern. Based on a similarity measure breaching a threshold, indication of object present may be produced.