Blade Crawler for Automated Aircraft Rotor Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual maintenance of airfoil-shaped aircraft components, such as rotorcraft blades, is costly, labor-intensive, and prone to human error, requiring frequent removal and reattachment, which reduces aircraft mission capability and increases the risk of accidents due to undetected flaws.

Innovation Solution

An automated blade crawler system that performs maintenance functions like nondestructive inspection, drilling, and painting on airfoil-shaped bodies without removing them from the aircraft, using a platform with interchangeable end effectors and a stabilizing apparatus to support the blade tip, allowing movement in both spanwise and chordwise directions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual maintenance is performed by removing blade components from the aircraft, then maintenance functions can be carried out, but maintenance time and labor costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance qualityVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The blade component performs maintenance on itself through the automated end effector system that travels along the blade surface, eliminating the need to remove the blade for maintenance operations. The system includes an automated drill, scarfer, or grinder that can be positioned and operated directly on the installed blade component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual maintenance operations are replaced by an automated mechanical system consisting of an end effector mounted on a traveling mechanism. The end effector is controlled by a computer system that automates drilling, scarfing, grinding, and other maintenance functions, replacing skilled manual labor with automated mechanical processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If manual maintenance operations are performed, then maintenance functions can be completed, but the likelihood of human error increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance operabilityVSAvoiderror rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates sensors and detectors that provide real-time feedback on the maintenance process, including drill depth control, scarfer progression monitoring, and surface quality assessment. This feedback mechanism ensures precise control and eliminates human error in judgment and measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Human manual operations are completely replaced by automated mechanical systems with computer control. The automated end effector system eliminates variability in human performance and ensures consistent, precise execution of maintenance operations without human error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If blade components are removed and reattached frequently, then maintenance inspection can be performed, but aircraft mission capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection qualityVSAvoidmission capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The blade component undergoes maintenance and inspection while remaining installed on the aircraft structure. The automated end effector system accesses the blade surface through the helicopter fuselage opening, allowing the blade to serve both its flight function and maintenance function simultaneously without removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The blade component maintains continuous useful action by remaining installed during maintenance operations. The system enables uninterrupted blade functionality while performing inspection and maintenance, eliminating the downtime associated with removal and reattachment operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Productivity

If automated end effector systems are implemented, then maintenance efficiency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The end effector system is designed with multi-functionality, capable of performing drilling, scarfing, grinding, and other maintenance operations through interchangeable tools. This universal design consolidates multiple maintenance functions into a single integrated system, managing complexity through functional integration rather than proliferation of separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic, adjustable components including telescoping arms, movable end effectors, and reconfigurable tooling. This dynamic design allows the system to adapt to different blade configurations and maintenance requirements, managing complexity through flexibility and adjustability rather than fixed, specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11300477B2Apparatus for automated maintenance of aircraft structural elements
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 THE BOEING CO
  • US11300477B2 patent drawing
  • US11300477B2 patent drawing
  • US11300477B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Automated apparatus for performing maintenance functions on airfoil-shaped bodies having short chord lengths, the apparatus being movable in a spanwise direction along the airfoil-shaped body. In accordance with various embodiments, the apparatus comprises a blade crawler capable of supporting any one of a plurality of end effectors for performing a set of maintenance functions on an airfoil-shaped body, such as a blade component. Included in these functions are multiple options for nondestructive inspection, drilling, grinding, fastening, appliqué application, scarfing, ply mapping, depainting, cleaning, and painting devices that are attached as the end effector for the blade crawler. As a whole, the blade crawler reduces maintenance time, labor hours and human errors when robotic maintenance functions are performed on blade components.