Blasthole Explosive Delivery with Variable Density Gassing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for delivering explosives in blastholes struggle to efficiently vary the explosive energy and ensure uniform density distribution, leading to inconsistent detonation and energy release.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a first and second gassing agent reservoir, a homogenizer, and a mixer, which homogenizes the emulsion matrix with the first gassing agent and introduces the second gassing agent at varying flow rates to form sensitized products of different densities, ensuring uniform density and energy distribution in the blasthole.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single gassing agent is used to sensitize emulsion explosives, then the system is simple, but the explosive energy cannot be varied and density distribution is inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexplosive energy variation capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the gassing agent into two separate reservoirs (first gassing agent reservoir and second gassing agent reservoir) that can be independently controlled. This segmentation allows different gassing agents to be introduced at different stages and in different quantities, enabling variation of explosive energy while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces dynamic control by allowing the flow rate of the second gassing agent to be varied during the sensitization process. The controller can adjust the amount of second gassing agent introduced based on desired explosive energy levels, transforming a static single-agent system into a dynamic multi-agent system with adaptable explosive output

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If gassing agent is introduced without flow rate control, then the process is simple, but gas bubble coalescence and migration occur leading to non-uniform density

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedensity uniformityVSAvoidflow control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates flow rate controllers that monitor and regulate the introduction of gassing agents into the emulsion explosives. By controlling the flow rate of the second gassing agent, the system prevents excessive gas bubble formation that would lead to coalescence and migration, ensuring uniform density distribution through active feedback control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The flow rate controller acts as an intermediary device between the gassing agent reservoir and the emulsion explosives. It mediates the introduction process by precisely regulating the amount of gas introduced, preventing direct uncontrolled gas injection that would cause bubble coalescence and density non-uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If multiple gassing agents are introduced at different flow rates, then explosive energy can be precisely controlled, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexplosive energy control precisionVSAvoidmulti-reservoir system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different qualities to different parts of the process by using two distinct gassing agents with potentially different properties. The first gassing agent provides baseline sensitization while the second gassing agent, introduced at controlled flow rates, provides precise explosive energy adjustment. This local differentiation of agent functions enables precise energy control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of gassing agent flow rate to control explosive energy. By varying the flow rate of the second gassing agent introduced into the emulsion explosives, the system can precisely adjust the amount of gas bubbles formed, thereby controlling the explosive energy output while maintaining a structured multi-reservoir architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves precise control over explosive energy and density, enhancing detonation consistency and efficiency by reducing gas bubble coalescence and migration, thereby optimizing the explosive performance.

Implementation Method 1

a homogenizer configured to mix the emulsion matrix and the first gassing agent into a homogenized product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHomogenization:

Implementation Method 2

a mixer configured to mix the homogenized product with the second gassing agent to form a sensitized product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMixing:

Implementation Method 3

Sensitizing is often accomplished by introducing small voids into the emulsion. These voids act as hot spots for propagating detonation.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas bubble formation: Bubble

Implementation Method 4

The system achieves precise control over explosive energy and density, enhancing detonation consistency and efficiency by reducing gas bubble coalescence and migration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas bubble migration:

Data Source

PatentUS12510342B2Systems for delivering explosives and methods related thereto
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 DYNO NOBEL INC
  • US12510342B2 patent drawing
  • US12510342B2 patent drawing
  • US12510342B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems for delivering explosives with variable densities are disclosed herein. Methods of delivering explosives with variable densities and methods of varying the energy of explosives in a blasthole are disclosed herein.