Block-Based Processor Architecture for Energy-Efficient Execution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current processor architectures, such as superscalar out-of-order microarchitectures, face challenges in sustaining performance improvements due to complexity and resource intensity, particularly in register renaming, dataflow analysis, and misspeculation recovery, which hinders energy efficiency and area optimization.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of block-based processor architectures with explicit data graph execution (EDGE) ISA, which organizes instructions into blocks for atomic execution, reduces the need for complex architectural features like register renaming and misspeculation recovery, and uses hybrid dataflow execution to support high instruction-level parallelism and out-of-order execution with near in-order power efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If superscalar out-of-order microarchitectures are used to improve processor performance, then instruction-level parallelism is enhanced, but device complexity and resource intensity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessor performanceVSAvoidarchitectural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processor architecture segments instructions into fixed-size blocks (e.g., 4 instructions per block) that are decoded and executed together. This block-based organization simplifies the control logic by eliminating the need for complex dynamic scheduling, register renaming, and speculation mechanisms while maintaining high instruction-level parallelism through block-level parallel execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The architecture changes the fundamental execution parameter from dynamic out-of-order execution of individual instructions to fixed-block atomic execution. This parameter change simplifies the control unit design, reduces hardware resources, and improves energy efficiency while maintaining productivity through optimized block scheduling and compilation techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If complex architectural features like register renaming and misspeculation recovery are implemented to improve performance, then instruction throughput increases, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction throughputVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The architecture extracts and eliminates complex energy-consuming features such as register renaming, dynamic scheduling, and misspeculation recovery mechanisms. By removing these components, the design achieves lower energy consumption while maintaining high instruction throughput through simplified block-based execution and compilation optimizations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The architecture uses simple, fixed-block instruction structures that can be rapidly decoded and executed without requiring complex hardware state management. This approach replaces expensive, complex architectural features with simpler, more energy-efficient mechanisms that achieve similar or better throughput for many workloads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Device complexity

If block-based processor architectures with atomic execution are used to simplify hardware, then device complexity is reduced, but flexibility in instruction ordering may be limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware simplicityVSAvoidinstruction ordering flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The architecture performs instruction reordering and optimization during the compilation phase rather than requiring dynamic hardware reordering capabilities. The compiler analyzes dependencies and arranges instructions within blocks to maximize parallelism and efficiency, allowing the hardware to execute blocks atomically without complex reordering logic while still achieving high adaptability for different workloads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11977891B2Implicit program order
Publication Date: 2024.05.07 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US11977891B2 patent drawing
  • US11977891B2 patent drawing
  • US11977891B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods are disclosed for controlling execution of memory access instructions in a block-based processor architecture using a hardware structure that generates a relative ordering of memory access instruction in an instruction block. In one example of the disclosed technology, a method of executing an instruction block having a plurality of memory load and/or memory store instructions includes decoding an instruction block encoding a plurality of memory access instructions and generating data indicating a relative order for executing the memory access instructions in the instruction block and scheduling operation of a portion of the instruction block based at least in part on the relative order data. In some examples, a store vector data register can store the generated relative ordering data for use in subsequent instances of the instruction block.