Interfacial Bonding Test Structure for 3D IC Delamination Risk

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Semiconductor packages face challenges such as mechanical issues due to thermal expansion mismatch, leading to warpage, cracking, and delamination, particularly in high-performance 3-dimensional integrated circuits, which affect solder connections and overall package reliability.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of reinforcement structures, including stiffener rings and underfill materials, to enhance mechanical stability and compensate for thermal stresses, along with interfacial bonding test structures for evaluating bonding energies using a four-point bending test.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If 3-dimensional integrated circuits are fabricated by placing chips over chips on a semiconductor wafer level, then integration density and bandwidth are improved, but mechanical issues such as warpage, cracking, and delamination occur due to thermal expansion mismatch between package components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration densityVSAvoidmechanical stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

An intermediate buffer layer is introduced between the semiconductor die and the substrate. This buffer layer has a coefficient of thermal expansion that is intermediate between the die and substrate, acting as a mediator to reduce thermal expansion mismatch and prevent mechanical defects such as warpage, cracking, and delamination during fabrication and operation of 3D integrated circuits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material structures that combine materials with different thermal expansion coefficients in a layered configuration. This composite approach allows the structure to accommodate differential thermal expansion between components while maintaining mechanical integrity and reliability in high-density 3D integrated circuits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If reinforcement structures such as stiffener rings and underfill materials are added to enhance mechanical stability, then warpage and delamination are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical stabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly reinforcing the entire package structure, stiffener rings are strategically placed at specific locations where mechanical stress concentration is most likely to occur. This localized reinforcement approach provides necessary mechanical stability while minimizing the overall complexity and material usage compared to uniform reinforcement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If interfacial bonding test structures are implemented to evaluate bonding energies, then reliability of solder connections is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strengthVSAvoidfabrication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The test structure is segmented into distinct functional regions including bonding test areas and isolation areas. This segmentation allows the bonding evaluation function to be isolated in specific zones, enabling reliable measurement of interfacial bonding energies while containing the added manufacturing complexity to localized regions rather than affecting the entire device fabrication process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves co-planarity of solder connections, reduces warpage, and enhances the reliability of semiconductor packages by providing mechanical support and predicting interfacial bonding strengths, thereby ensuring stable electrical connections.

Implementation Method 1

interfacial bonding test structures that may be used in a four-point bending test to determine an interfacial bonding energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFour-point bending test:

Data Source

PatentUS20250347602A1Test structures to determine integrated circuit bonding energies and methods of making and using the same
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US20250347602A1 patent drawing
  • US20250347602A1 patent drawing
  • US20250347602A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment interfacial bonding test structure may include a first substrate having a first planar surface, a second substrate having a second planar surface that is parallel to the first planar surface, a first semiconductor die, and a second semiconductor die, each semiconductor die bonded between the first substrate and the second substrate thereby forming a sandwich structure. The first semiconductor die and the second semiconductor die may be bonded to the first surface with a first adhesive and may be bonded to the second surface with a second adhesive. The first semiconductor die and the second semiconductor die may be displaced from one another by a first separation along a direction parallel to the first planar surface and the second planar surface. The second substrate may include a notch having an area that overlaps with an area of the first separation in a plan view.