Boom Assembly Vibration Control via Coordinate Transformation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Construction vehicles with boom assemblies face challenges in vibration reduction, which affects operator responsiveness and precision, as conventional methods often result in systems that are not responsive to operator inputs.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that include a boom assembly with an actuator and flow control valve, where a control signal is generated to reduce vibration by converting desired coordinates from Cartesian space to actuator space, calculating deflection errors, and shaping the signal using a time-varying input shaping scheme based on measured natural frequency and damping ratio.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional vibration reduction techniques are applied to the boom assembly, then vibration is reduced, but the system becomes less responsive to operator inputs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovevibrationVSAvoidresponsiveness to operator inputs
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts its characteristics based on operating conditions. The coordinate transformation from Cartesian to actuator space, combined with real-time deflection error calculation and input shaping, creates a dynamic control response that adapts to the boom's flexible behavior while maintaining operator responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by calculating deflection errors based on measured actuator displacements and using this information to adjust the control signal. The coordinate transformation and deflection compensation create a closed-loop system that continuously corrects for boom flexibility while preserving responsive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Length of moving object

If the boom assembly is extended to reach inaccessible areas, then accessibility is improved, but vibration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboom extension lengthVSAvoidvibration
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical vibration suppression methods with an electronic control system. The coordinate transformation module and input shaping module use computational methods to counteract vibration effects, allowing the boom to be extended without proportionally increasing vibration problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control parameters dynamically through coordinate transformation from Cartesian to actuator space. This parameter transformation allows the control system to account for the changing dynamic characteristics of the extended boom, maintaining stability and reducing vibration even at full extension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If precise control of the end effector is achieved through coordinate transformation and deflection compensation, then positioning accuracy is improved, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveend effector positioning accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller performs multiple functions through a unified coordinate transformation approach. The same transformation module that converts Cartesian coordinates to actuator space also enables deflection error calculation and compensation, reducing the need for separate complex subsystems while achieving precise positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8352129B2Motion control of work vehicle
Publication Date: 2013.01.08 DANFOSS AS
  • US8352129B2 patent drawing
  • US8352129B2 patent drawing
  • US8352129B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a boom assembly includes providing a boom assembly having an end effortor. The boom assembly includes an actuator in fluid communication with a flow control valve. A desired coordinate of the end effector of the boom assembly is converted from Cartesian space to actuator space. A deflection error of the end effector based on a measured displacement of the actuator is calculated. A resultant desired coordinate of the end effector is calculated based on the desired coordinate and the deflection error. A control signal for the flow control valve is generated based on the resultant desired coordinate and the measured displacement of the actuator. The control signal is shaped to reduce vibration of the boom assembly. The shaped control signal is transmitted to the flow control valve.