Electromechanical Brake Back Drive Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional aircraft brake systems using electromechanical actuators (EMAs) face challenges in maintaining efficient brake clearance without power, as they rely on electromechanical drive for reverse rotation, which is not available during power loss, leading to potential dragging brakes and unsafe operations.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a supplemental back drive mechanism with a torsion spring and clutch to accumulate and release back drive potential energy, allowing for reverse rotation and retraction of the ball nut piston without electromechanical actuation, ensuring safe brake clearance even in power loss scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If an electromechanical actuator relies on a motor and controller to create piston retraction, then braking control precision is improved, but the system becomes unable to back drive the piston to clearance position when power is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake clearance control precisionVSAvoidfailsafe operation during power loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The torsion spring is pre-loaded during the forward braking stroke to accumulate potential energy, which is then released to automatically back-drive the piston to clearance position when power is lost, without requiring additional control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own operational movements (forward braking stroke) to charge the torsion spring, making the backup mechanism self-sufficient and eliminating the need for external power or complex control systems during failure mode

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If the electromechanical actuator uses reverse efficiency to back drive the piston during power loss, then failsafe operation is improved, but the response time and effectiveness are insufficient due to mechanical inefficiencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailsafe operation during power lossVSAvoidresponse time for brake clearance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The torsion spring provides more than sufficient force to overcome mechanical inefficiencies and back-drive the piston to full clearance position, ensuring rapid and complete brake release even under adverse conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system alternates between charging the torsion spring during normal braking operations and discharging it during power loss events, creating a periodic energy storage and release cycle that ensures rapid response when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If a supplemental back drive mechanism with torsion spring is added, then failsafe operation during power loss is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailsafe operation during power lossVSAvoidactuator mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The torsion spring back-drive mechanism is integrated into the existing actuator housing and shares common components such as the ball screw and ball nut, merging the backup mechanism with the primary actuation system to minimize additional complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The ball screw mechanism serves dual functions: it transmits motor-driven force during normal operation and converts torsion spring torque to linear piston retraction during power loss, eliminating the need for separate mechanical components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of manufacture

If the system allows lower efficiency drivetrain design with supplemental back drive, then manufacturing costs are reduced, but energy loss during normal operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidenergy loss during braking operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system accepts higher energy loss during normal operation as a trade-off, converting what would be wasted energy into useful work by charging the torsion spring, which then provides free backup operation and enables simpler, cheaper drivetrain components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The supplemental back drive mechanism provides a failsafe operation during power failures, reduces response time, and extends the operational life of EMAs by overcoming mechanical inefficiencies, while also allowing for a lower efficiency drivetrain design, decreasing complexity and costs.

Implementation Method 1

The supplemental back drive mechanism may comprise a torsion spring. Forward rotation of the ball screw in response to actuation of the electromechanical actuator may produce forward rotation of the rotating end of the torsion spring. A back drive potential energy may be accumulated in the torsion spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorsion spring: Torsion Spring

Data Source

PatentEP3045360B1Electromechanically actuated brake with supplemental back drive
Publication Date: 2020.11.25 GOODRICH CORP
  • EP3045360B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3045360B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3045360B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

An electromechanical actuator 200 in an aircraft brake system may include a stationary body, an actuator drive unit 210 in an actuator drive unit housing 211, a ball screw 206 coupled to the actuator drive unit 210, and a ball nut piston 204 coupled to the ball screw 206. A supplemental back drive mechanism may be disposed between the ball screw 206 and the stationary body. The supplemental back drive mechanism may comprise a spring 220 and a clutch 230. The spring 220 may store back drive potential energy when the electromechanical actuator is actuated to drive the ball nut piston 204 forward, and may supply back drive energy to the retract the ball nut piston 204.