Brake Valve Bleed Line With Check Bypass for Pressure Spike Damping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydraulic brake systems in work machines experience pressure spikes and noise due to unrestricted fluid flow, and voiding of the spring chamber when the brake pedal is released, which affects operator feedback and system performance.

Innovation Solution

A retarding control assembly with a bleed line featuring a check valve and a restricted bypass orifice is implemented between the spring chamber and the tank, allowing controlled fluid flow to prevent voiding and dampen pressure spikes, ensuring smooth operation and reduced noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If free flow of fluid into and out of the spring chamber is provided, then operator feedback is improved, but pressure spikes are experienced by the operator

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator feedbackVSAvoidpressure spikes
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A check valve is introduced as an intermediary component in the bleed line between the spring chamber and tank. The check valve allows fluid to flow freely from the spring chamber to the tank during brake release, preventing pressure spikes, while restricting reverse flow to maintain proper chamber pressure and operator feedback characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The flow characteristics of the bleed line are modified by introducing a check valve that dynamically changes the flow direction parameters. The valve allows unrestricted flow in one direction (chamber to tank) while restricting flow in the opposite direction, thereby controlling pressure dynamics without compromising operator feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If fluid flow into the spring chamber is overly restricted or prevented, then pressure spikes are reduced, but a void in the chamber develops and noise is heard

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure spikesVSAvoidnoise and voiding
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The check valve acts as a selective mediator that permits fluid flow from the spring chamber to the tank during brake release, preventing void formation and associated noise, while simultaneously blocking reverse flow that would cause pressure spikes. This directional control resolves both harmful effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of restricting flow in both directions or allowing free flow in both directions, the system inverts the approach by allowing free flow in one direction (outward) while restricting flow in the opposite direction (inward). This asymmetric flow control eliminates both pressure spikes and void formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the spring chamber is allowed to void when the brake pedal is released, then pressure spikes are reduced, but operator feedback deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure spikesVSAvoidoperator feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The check valve serves as a mediator that prevents fluid from entering the spring chamber from the tank during brake release, thereby preventing chamber voiding and maintaining proper operator feedback, while still allowing the chamber to discharge pressure to the tank to reduce pressure spikes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents voiding of the spring chamber and reduces pressure spikes, enhancing operator feedback and system stability by allowing controlled leakage flow, thereby improving the overall performance and feel of the brake pedal.

Implementation Method 1

The bleed line may include a check valve configured to allow fluid flow from the spring chamber to the tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCheck valve unidirectional flow: Valve

Implementation Method 2

The check valve bypass may be arranged in parallel with the check valve and may define a restricted pathway sized to damp pressure spikes and establish leakage flow to the spring chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRestricted orifice flow restriction: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 3

a bleed line configured for arrangement between a spring chamber of a brake command assembly and a tank line

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic fluid flow: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11738732B2Automatic retarding control system
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US11738732B2 patent drawing
  • US11738732B2 patent drawing
  • US11738732B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A retarding control assembly for a brake valve may include a bleed line configured for arrangement between a spring chamber of a brake command assembly and a tank line. The bleed line may include a check valve configured to allow fluid flow from the spring chamber to the tank and a check valve bypass configured to allow fluid flow from the tank line to the spring chamber passed the check valve and defining a restricted pathway.