Electro-pneumatic Brake Control Without Axle Load Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current service brake systems for commercial vehicles are either costly, complex, and require axle load sensors, limiting their robustness and maintainability, and can only use either differential slip control or pressure control, not both simultaneously.

Innovation Solution

A combined electro-pneumatic brake system that dynamically selects and combines input vectors from various sensors and algorithms to independently determine an optimal braking strategy without axle load sensors, integrating pressure control and differential slip control for improved robustness and cost-effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If pressure control is used with axle load sensors, then braking force distribution is optimized, but system cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking force distributionVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical axle load sensors with an electronic calculation system that computes axle load based on wheel speeds and vehicle parameters. This substitution eliminates mechanical components while achieving the same functional goal of determining braking force distribution according to actual axle load conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces wheel speed sensors as intermediary measurement points that can be indirectly used to calculate axle load. Instead of directly measuring axle load with dedicated sensors, the system uses wheel speed data as a mediator to infer the axle load condition and adjust braking forces accordingly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If differential slip control is used, then adaptation to load changes is achieved, but brake pedal feel becomes non-constant and requires repeated adaptation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload adaptationVSAvoidbrake pedal feel
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the control unit continuously monitors wheel speeds, calculates current axle load, compares it with stored reference values, and automatically adjusts braking forces. This closed-loop feedback ensures constant brake pedal feel while adapting to load changes without requiring driver intervention or repeated adaptation phases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent stores reference axle load values and corresponding braking force characteristics in advance during system initialization or manufacturing. When operation begins, these pre-stored references are immediately available for comparison and adjustment, eliminating the need for repeated adaptation phases and ensuring consistent brake pedal feel from the start

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If axle load sensors are installed, then accurate axle load measurement is achieved, but system cost and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxle load measurementVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes existing wheel speed sensors serve multiple functions: their primary function for anti-lock braking is enhanced by their secondary function of providing data for axle load calculation in service braking. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate axle load sensors, reducing system cost and complexity while maintaining measurement capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the braking system to determine its own operating parameters (axle load) using data already collected by its existing sensors. The control unit performs self-diagnosis and self-adjustment by calculating axle load from wheel speed measurements, eliminating the need for additional dedicated measurement devices and reducing overall system cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP2210787B2Electro-pneumatic brake system with control without axle load signal
Publication Date: 2022.05.04 KNORR BREMSE SYSTEME FUER NUTZFAHIZEUGE GMBH
  • EP2210787B2 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

The electro-pneumatic braking system has a detection- and decision unit (10) which detects input quantities from different signal sources. A control unit (30) is provided for determining an intermediate size for brake pressure calculation which supplies an input vector (V2) containing an input quantity. The input vector is generated by the detection- and decision unit as a function of an operating situation or availability of input quantity.