Aircraft Brake Control Unit Disable via Dual Enable Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft brake systems face challenges in ensuring reliable braking operations when the Brake Control Unit (BCU) fails, as existing systems lack effective redundancy to enable other controllers or systems to take control and maintain safe braking.

Innovation Solution

The proposed brake system includes a Vehicle Management System (VMS) communicating with a controller, a shutoff valve, and a servo valve, using dual enable signals to trigger a disable interrupt service routine that prevents the controller from communicating with the valve, allowing the VMS to take full control and reboot the system in case of BCU failure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the BCU is given full control of the brake system, then normal braking operations are simplified and efficient, but the system becomes vulnerable to failures when the BCU malfunctions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking operation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem reliability under failure conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-configures two independent enable signals (first enable signal via first wire, second enable signal via second wire) that can independently disable the BCU. This preliminary arrangement ensures that if the BCU fails, the VMS can immediately take control without needing to diagnose the failure first, thus maintaining reliability while preserving normal operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The VMS acts as an intermediary system that can intervene in the BCU-valve communication path. By introducing the VMS as a mediator with the authority to disable the BCU through dual enable signals, the system allows normal BCU operation while providing a safety mechanism for failure scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the VMS is given the ability to take control from the BCU, then system reliability under failure conditions improves, but the control architecture becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliability under failure conditionsVSAvoidcontrol architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control architecture is segmented into distinct functional components: the BCU for normal operation, the VMS for supervisory control, and two separate communication paths (first wire and second wire) for enable signals. This segmentation allows the system to maintain simple normal operations while embedding complexity only in the failure recovery path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The complexity of dual-wire enable signals and VMS intervention capability is localized only to the control arbitration mechanism, while the actual braking operation remains simple and unchanged. The BCU continues to control valves normally during healthy operation, and the complex VMS takeover logic is only activated locally when failure conditions are detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If dual enable signals are used to disable the BCU, then control authority can be reliably transferred to the VMS, but the wiring and control logic become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol transfer reliabilityVSAvoidwiring and control logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The disable functionality is extracted as a separate, dedicated mechanism independent of normal braking control. The two enable signals are taken out as distinct communication channels (first wire and second wire) that operate separately from the main control path, allowing reliable control transfer without complicating the primary braking operation logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP3392103B1Brake control system with disabling features
Publication Date: 2021.03.31 GOODRICH CORP
  • EP3392103B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3392103B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3392103B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A brake system may comprise a controller (280), a vehicle management system (VMS) (270) in communication with the controller, a valve (242) in communication with the controller, and a tangible, non-transitory memory configured to communicate with the controller, the tangible, non-transitory memory having instructions stored thereon that, in response to execution by the controller, cause the controller to perform operations comprising determining, by the controller, that a first enable signal is received by the controller from the VMS, determining, by the controller, that a second enable signal is received by the controller from the VMS, and disabling, by the controller, the controller from control of the valve in response to the first enable signal and the second enable signal.