Brake Controller Common Motor Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing braking control systems face challenges in minimizing the influence between fluid pressure systems driven by a common source while maintaining miniaturization and reducing costs and power consumption, particularly due to the need for larger orifice diameters and increased electrical power consumption.

Innovation Solution

A braking control apparatus with first and second pumps driven by a common source, featuring control valves and a target pressure determination mechanism to adjust fluid pressures in wheel cylinders, reducing the driving force or rotational speed of the driving source when necessary, and incorporating a regenerative braking unit to manage fluid pressure effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the orifice diameter of the pressure reducing valve is increased to rapidly reduce pressure, then the pressure reduction speed is improved, but the spring for biasing the plunger becomes larger, requiring larger coils and increased electrical power consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure reduction speedVSAvoidelectrical power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure reducing valve employs dynamic control by adjusting the opening degree of the valve based on real-time pressure feedback from both the first and second fluid pressure systems. The valve opening is dynamically modified to balance pressure reduction speed with power consumption, rather than using a fixed large orifice that would always require large biasing springs and high power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates pressure sensors in both fluid pressure systems that provide feedback to the control unit. The control unit uses this feedback information to dynamically adjust the pressure reducing valve opening, optimizing the balance between pressure reduction speed and power consumption based on actual system conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Stability of the object's composition

If a cut-off valve is provided between the pump and wheel cylinder to suppress mutual control interference, then the fluid pressure control stability is improved, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid pressure control stabilityVSAvoidvalve system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using cut-off valves that would isolate the systems, the patent employs a pressure reducing valve as an intermediary component that actively regulates pressure in one system while considering the state of the other system. This mediator approach maintains system connectivity while suppressing mutual interference through intelligent control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control parameter from binary valve opening/closing to continuous pressure reduction control. By adjusting the pressure reducing valve opening degree continuously based on pressure sensor feedback, the system achieves stable fluid pressure control without requiring additional cut-off valves, thereby reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If the spring for biasing the plunger is made large to accommodate increased orifice diameter, then the pressure reducing capability is improved, but the coil and other components become larger, making miniaturization difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure reducing capabilityVSAvoidvalve component size
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure reducing valve uses dynamic opening control instead of relying on a large static spring force. By controlling the valve opening degree electronically based on pressure feedback, the system achieves effective pressure reduction without requiring oversized mechanical components like springs and coils, enabling miniaturization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical spring-biasing system with an electronically controlled valve system. Instead of using a large mechanical spring to provide biasing force for a large orifice, the system uses electronic control signals to regulate the valve opening, substituting mechanical sizing with electronic control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP2481649B1Brake controller
Publication Date: 2015.05.06 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • EP2481649B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2481649B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2481649B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

In a braking control apparatus 100, each of a pump 7 and a pump 8 is driven by a common first motor 11. A brake ECU200 supplies operating fluid to each of pipelines H1 and H2 by operating the first motor 11, and controls opening/closing of a fluid pressure regulating valve SLFR so as to make the wheel cylinder pressure in the right front wheel approach the right front wheel target pressure, and controls opening closing of a fluid pressure regulating valve SLRL so as to make the wheel cylinder pressure in the left rear wheel approach the left rear wheel target pressure. In the case where the right front wheel target pressure is zero when the fluid pressure regulating valve SLRL is to be opened so as to make the wheel cylinder pressure in the left rear wheel approach the left rear wheel target pressure, the brake ECU200 turns off the first motor 11.