Electromechanical Brake Controller Current Limiting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electromechanical brake systems in vehicles, such as aircraft, face challenges with peak power demand, leading to increased size and weight of power supplies and associated components, which is undesirable in weight-conscious environments.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a motor current limiter that sets positive and negative current limits based on motor velocity, reducing peak power demand and allowing for a smaller and lighter power supply, along with closed-loop feedback control for precise motor drive signal generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the power supply is sized to meet peak power demands without current limits, then the motor can deliver full power at all speeds, but the size and weight of the power supply and associated components increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak power demandVSAvoidweight of power supply
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the current limits variable rather than fixed. The positive and negative current limits are dynamically adjusted based on motor velocity through the relationship I_limit = k * ω, where k is a constant and ω is the motor velocity. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to deliver full power when needed while reducing peak power demands during normal operation, thereby enabling a smaller, lighter power supply.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of current limits from fixed values to velocity-dependent values. By establishing current limits that are a function of motor velocity (positive current limit and negative current limit both being a function of ω), the system optimizes power delivery across different operating conditions. This parameter change resolves the contradiction by allowing full power capability when required while maintaining smaller average power demands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If larger conductors are used to handle peak power demands, then power delivery capability is sufficient, but the size and weight of the braking system components increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower delivery capabilityVSAvoidsize of cabling
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The dynamic current limiting based on motor velocity reduces the peak power demands that the cabling must handle. Since the current limits are adjusted according to operating conditions (I_limit = k * ω), the cabling only needs to be sized for the reduced peak demands rather than maximum theoretical demands, resulting in smaller, lighter cabling while maintaining sufficient power delivery capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Power

If current limits are set as a function of motor velocity, then peak power demand is reduced, but the controller complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak power demandVSAvoidcontroller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller uses feedback from the motor velocity sensor to dynamically adjust the current limits. The relationship I_limit = k * ω requires continuous monitoring of motor velocity and corresponding adjustment of current limits, implementing a feedback control mechanism that resolves the contradiction between reduced peak power demand and controller complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller complexity is managed by implementing a straightforward parameter relationship (current limit proportional to velocity) rather than complex control algorithms. This simple parameter change approach achieves peak power demand reduction while minimizing the increase in controller complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP1963150B1Controller for electromechanical braking system with power demand limitation and method
Publication Date: 2009.07.29 GOODRICH CORP
  • EP1963150B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP1963150B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP1963150B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A system and method for limiting peak power demand of a controller (26) for an electromechanical actuator. A motor current command is limited to at least one of a positive current limit or a negative current limit, the positive and negative current limits being a function of motor velocity. A motor drive signal is output to the motor in accordance with the limited motor current command.