Electromagnetic Brake Current Monitoring for Faster Robot Cycles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional robot control systems with non-excited operation type electromagnetic brakes face challenges in shortening cycle time, accurately estimating brake life, and diagnosing abnormalities due to complex configurations and lengthy timer settings, which hinder efficient operation and production line productivity.

Innovation Solution

A robot control device that monitors and controls the current through the excitation coil to estimate the attraction and release times of the armature, detects wear on the friction plate, and performs abnormality diagnosis using simple configurations, allowing for precise control and diagnosis of the electromagnetic brake.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a long timer time is set to ensure safety margin for brake operation, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to longer cycle time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake operation safetyVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device monitors the actual current through the excitation coil in real-time and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust the timer time. By detecting the actual brake operation status through current monitoring, the system sets the timer time based on actual conditions rather than using a fixed conservative value, thus shortening cycle time while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The timer time is changed dynamically based on monitored current characteristics. The control device adjusts the timer time according to the actual brake state and operational conditions, transitioning from a static conservative setting to a dynamic adaptive setting that optimizes both safety and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a long timer time is set to account for individual differences and material variations, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake operation consistencyVSAvoidtimer time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors the actual current through the excitation coil and uses this information to adjust the timer time accordingly. This feedback mechanism allows the system to account for individual differences and material variations in real-time, setting an appropriate timer time for each specific condition rather than using a universally long conservative value

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If discharge circuit is provided to lower counter electromotive voltage, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol circuit protectionVSAvoidcircuit configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device utilizes the existing current monitoring capability to detect brake operation status and automatically adjusts the timer time based on this information. This self-service approach allows the system to protect itself from timing errors and operational issues without requiring additional external discharge circuits or complex protective components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables shorter cycle times, accurate estimation of brake life, and efficient abnormality diagnosis, improving operational efficiency and reducing downtime in robot systems.

Implementation Method 1

when the excitation coil is energized, it releases the brake operation by attracting the armature to the exciting brake side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

when the excitation coil is de-energized, it presses the armature against the friction plate by the urging force of the spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

presses the armature against the friction plate by the urging force of the spring, and when the excitation coil is energized, it releases the brake operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10994412B2Robot control device and robot provided with the same
Publication Date: 2021.05.04 KAWASAKI JUKOGYO KK
  • US10994412B2 patent drawing
  • US10994412B2 patent drawing
  • US10994412B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot control device having a drive shaft driven by a servo motor including a non-excited operation type electromagnetic brake. The electromagnetic brake is configured to perform a braking operation by pressing an armature against a friction plate by an urging force of a spring when an excitation coil is not energized, and to cancel a brake operation by attracting the armature to the excitation coil side against the urging force of the spring to separate the armature from the friction plate when the excitation coil is energized. A coil current flowing through the excitation coil is obtained and the robot is controlled based on the characteristic of time change of the obtained coil current. A robot control device capable of shortening a cycle time, estimating the life of the electromagnetic brake, performing abnormality diagnosis and the like with a relatively simple configuration can be provided.