Aircraft Brake Metering for Structural Load Alleviation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft electric brake systems face challenges in achieving accurate brake clamping force, leading to uneven brake energy distribution, which affects directional stability and causes structural fatigue and damage during low-speed taxiing and rapid braking, failing to meet industry standards for accuracy and safety.

Innovation Solution

The system divides electric brake actuators into two portions, one for low clamping force and one for high clamping force, and introduces a brake metering function that delays the full onset of braking by limiting initial brake effort to a preset fraction for a set period, allowing for more precise control and reduced structural loading without requiring speed-based conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of stationary object

If a minimum light residual clamping brake force is maintained during taxiing, then brake wear is reduced, but brake clamping force accuracy deteriorates and directional stability is affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake residual force maintenance durationVSAvoidbrake clamping force accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The brake actuator is divided into multiple independent actuators (first, second, third, and fourth actuators) that can be controlled separately. This segmentation allows selective application of brake force to specific wheels, enabling precise control of residual clamping force while maintaining overall braking effectiveness and directional stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different residual clamping forces are applied to different wheels based on their specific operational requirements. The system selectively maintains residual force on certain wheels while allowing others to be fully released, creating local variations in brake force that preserve both accuracy and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Speed

If full rapid braking is applied during low speed taxiing, then stopping distance is reduced, but structural fatigue and damage to aircraft components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake application speedVSAvoidaircraft structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary braking force to selected wheels before full braking is required. By gradually engaging brakes on specific wheels first (particularly the nose gear), the system prepares the aircraft for stopping while distributing structural loads more evenly, preventing sudden shock loads that cause fatigue and damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The brake control system dynamically adjusts braking force distribution based on real-time aircraft conditions, including speed, weight distribution, and structural load capacity. This dynamic control allows the system to optimize stopping performance while continuously adapting to prevent excessive structural loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Power

If brake clamping force is increased to improve stopping performance, then braking effectiveness is improved, but unequal distribution of brake energy causes directional instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake powerVSAvoidaircraft directional stability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The braking system is segmented into multiple independently controlled actuators on different wheels. This allows the system to apply brake power selectively to specific wheels rather than uniformly to all wheels, enabling precise control of energy distribution to maintain directional stability while achieving effective stopping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system intentionally creates asymmetric brake force distribution across the aircraft's wheels based on directional stability requirements. By applying different braking forces to left and right wheels or to different gear assemblies, the system maintains optimal directional control while achieving the required stopping performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances brake accuracy and sensitivity, reduces structural loading, and minimizes brake wear by maintaining a residual clamping force during taxiing, while allowing full braking effort after a preset delay, thus improving directional stability and extending aircraft lifespan.

Implementation Method 1

it causes the friction surfaces of the carbon brakes to make contact, creating brake torque to slow down the rotational speed of the wheel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3092159B1System and method for aircraft brake metering to alleviate structural loading
Publication Date: 2017.08.23 HYDRO AIRE INC
  • EP3092159B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3092159B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3092159B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

In a system and method for aircraft brake metering to alleviate structural loading, one or more electric brake actuators for wheel brakes having a range of brake clamping force are provided, and a brake actuation controller is configured to monitor commanded initiation of the aircraft, to limit initial brake effort of the electric brake actuators to a preset fraction of a maximum possible braking effort for a preset period of time, and to permit brake effort of the electric brake actuators up to the maximum possible braking effort after the preset period of time after initiation of braking has been commanded. The preset fraction is preferably approximately 50% of the maximum possible braking effort, and may be tuneable. The preset period of time is preferably approximately one second, and also may be tuneable.