Brake System Checking via Automated Pressure Regime

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for checking railway vehicle braking systems are inefficient, requiring manual and time-consuming processes, and existing mobile compressed air units do not facilitate a streamlined or semi-automatic process.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a pressure-regulating system that connects to central brake lines, applying a predetermined pressure regime to check and control the engagement and disengagement of braking elements, with automated and remote monitoring capabilities to reduce the need for manual inspection rounds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual inspection methods are used to check braking systems, then comprehensive checking can be performed, but the process is time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake system checking completenessVSAvoidinspection duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The braking system performs self-diagnosis through automated pressure application and sensor monitoring. The control unit automatically controls the brake reservoirs, monitors pressure levels, and determines brake engagement status without requiring manual inspection rounds, enabling the system to check itself

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical inspection by inspectors is replaced by an automated electronic control system with pressure sensors and a control unit that electronically monitors and evaluates brake system status, substituting human labor with automated sensing and control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If multiple inspection rounds are performed to verify brake engagement and disengagement, then accurate verification is achieved, but the process becomes cumbersome and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake status verification accuracyVSAvoidinspection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously monitors pressure in the brake reservoirs throughout the testing process, maintaining continuous awareness of brake status rather than performing discrete inspection rounds. This continuous monitoring enables accurate verification while eliminating the need for multiple separate inspection cycles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

Pressure sensors provide continuous feedback to the control unit about the actual pressure levels in the brake reservoirs. The control unit uses this feedback to automatically determine when brakes are engaged or disengaged and to verify test results, creating a closed-loop system that ensures accuracy without requiring manual verification rounds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If inspectors manually control compressed air units for pressure testing, then precise pressure control is achieved, but the process requires significant human involvement and time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure control precisionVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit automatically controls the brake reservoirs to apply and release brakes based on predetermined pressure levels. The system self-regulates the pressure application process without requiring inspector intervention, maintaining precise pressure control while eliminating manual operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual control of compressed air units by inspectors is replaced by an automated control unit that electronically manages pressure application. The control unit precisely controls pressure levels and timing, substituting manual mechanical control with automated electronic control for both precision and simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the time and manpower required for brake system checks by automating pressure tests and allowing remote monitoring, ensuring efficient and accurate verification of brake functionality.

Implementation Method 1

applying a predetermined pressure regime for checking from the fixed or mobile compressed air unit on the one or more central brake lines

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure control: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

the pressure-regulating system is adapted for monitoring the pressure from the fixed or mobile compressed air unit in the central brake lines

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure monitoring: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP3476679B1Method and device for checking braking installations of a combined train set
Publication Date: 2020.07.08 BEVOLVE BVBA
  • EP3476679B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3476679B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3476679B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to an improved method for checking a braking system of a railway vehicle, as well as a device for this, and the use of the device for the method.