Automatic Braking with Engine Torque Inhibition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

After a collision, drivers may not have sufficient perception of their vehicle's state or environment to make safe decisions to avoid additional accidents, as they remain free to control the accelerator pedal.

Innovation Solution

An automatic braking method that combines wheel braking with engine torque inhibition, utilizing life situation analysis and environmental monitoring to trigger optimal deceleration and immobilize the vehicle to prevent further accidents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the driver is allowed to control the accelerator pedal after a collision, then the driver maintains operational freedom, but the risk of secondary accidents increases due to insufficient perception of vehicle state and environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver operational freedomVSAvoidsafety after collision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the life situation and environment after collision detection, before the driver can press the accelerator. The control computer automatically evaluates parameters and determines the appropriate response (braking, engine torque inhibition) in advance, eliminating the need for driver decision-making in this critical post-collision phase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control computer acts as an intermediary between the driver's potential accelerator input and the vehicle's powertrain system. It monitors the accelerator pedal position and, when appropriate, inhibits engine torque delivery despite driver input, serving as a protective mediator that overrides driver action when safety concerns are detected

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If automatic braking is activated after collision, then vehicle immobilization is achieved, but additional control systems and sensors are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision safetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control computer is designed to perform multiple functions: it manages normal braking operations, handles collision detection and response, analyzes life situations, and controls engine torque inhibition. By making the control computer universal and multi-functional, the patent avoids adding separate dedicated systems for each function, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive safety capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines previously separate safety functions (brake control, collision detection, engine management) into an integrated system managed by a single control computer. The analysis unit merges environmental sensing, vehicle state monitoring, and decision-making algorithms into one cohesive system, reducing the number of separate components and interfaces required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP2621779B1Method for the automatic braking of a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2017.07.12 PSA AUTOMOBILES SA
  • EP2621779B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for the automatic braking of a motor vehicle, implementing a function for the management of the longitudinal dynamics of the vehicle (10), whereby, following the detection of a collision between the vehicle and an obstacle, vehicle (12) braking is carried out using wheel brakes. The invention is characterised in that it also acts on the control of the traction motor of the vehicle (18) so that engine torque is not delivered to the drive wheels of the vehicle after the collision, regardless of the driver's wishes.