Branched Tissue-Adhesive Polymer for Stronger Biocompatible Wound Closure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tissue adhesives lack the balance of mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and ease of application required for effective wound closure, with cyanoacrylates causing inflammation and hydrogels lacking sufficient adhesion strength.

Innovation Solution

A biodegradable and biocompatible branched polymer with a melting point of 37-70°C, elastic modulus of 10-200 kPa, and shear storage modulus of 1-100 kPa, featuring tissue-binding groups, allowing for easy application and strong adhesion to biological surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If cyanoacrylate-based glues are used for tissue adhesion, then adhesion strength is improved, but biocompatibility deteriorates due to severe inflammatory response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion strengthVSAvoidinflammatory response
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by using PCL and PEG polymers with specific molecular weights and ratios instead of cyanoacrylate, fundamentally altering the material's biocompatibility while maintaining adhesion through controlled polymer architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite polymer system combining PCL (for structural integrity and adhesion) and PEG (for biocompatibility and flexibility), where each component contributes specific properties to achieve both strong adhesion and minimal inflammatory response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If hydrogels are used for tissue adhesion, then biocompatibility is improved, but adhesion strength deteriorates due to insufficient holding capability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebiocompatibilityVSAvoidadhesion strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the biocompatibility advantage of hydrogels (PEG component) with the adhesion strength advantage of structural polymers (PCL component), creating a unified material that exhibits both properties simultaneously rather than requiring separate materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention adjusts the polymer composition parameters, specifically the ratio of PCL to PEG and their molecular weights, to optimize the balance between adhesion strength and biocompatibility for different tissue types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If an ideal bioadhesive is designed to be liquid at room temperature for easy application, then ease of operation is improved, but temperature control becomes critical to avoid tissue damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of applicationVSAvoidmelting point control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes the phase transition properties of the PCL-PEG polymer system, which transitions from solid to liquid at body temperature (37°C), allowing easy application in liquid form that automatically solidifies at the application site without requiring external heating or cooling control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Solution Approach 2:

The polymer system performs self-service by automatically adjusting its physical state according to temperature: remaining liquid during application for ease of use, then self-solidifying at body temperature to provide adhesion, eliminating the need for external temperature control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Strength

If the elastic modulus of the bioadhesive is increased to match stiffer tissues, then adhesion strength is improved, but compatibility with soft tissues deteriorates due to mechanical property mismatch

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion strengthVSAvoidmechanical property mismatch
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the elastic modulus parameter by adjusting the PCL:PEG ratio and polymer molecular weights, enabling tuning of the material's stiffness to match different tissue types from soft (brain) to moderately firm (muscle) without compromising adhesion strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The polymer provides enhanced adhesion and cohesion strength while maintaining biocompatibility, reducing tissue damage and inflammation, and does not require a carrier for administration.

Implementation Method 1

The melting point of the branched polymer is in the range from 37 to 70° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

at least one arm comprises a tissue-binding group; the adhesion strength of the branched polymer is more than 0.5N

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS12539349B2Biocompatible tissue-adhesive polymers
Publication Date: 2026.02.03 TECHNION RES & DEV FOUND LTD
  • US12539349B2 patent drawing
  • US12539349B2 patent drawing
  • US12539349B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a branched biodegradable and biocompatible polymer (e.g. polycaprolactone) and use thereof in bioadhesion of at least one biological surface.