Bumper Beam Central Flange Recesses for Controlled Deformation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bumper beams experience poor energy absorption in collisions, particularly in offset collisions, due to the deformation of fastening portions, which often deform in an unfavorable manner, leading to inadequate energy absorption.

Innovation Solution

The central flange of the bumper beam features transverse recesses extending along the webs for up to one-third of their length at the fastening portions, enhancing deformation properties by counteracting inward deflection and initiating controlled deformation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the beam structure is made rigid to maintain structural integrity, then strength is improved, but energy absorption capability deteriorates due to unfavorable deformation at fastening portions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidenergy absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing transverse recesses specifically at the fastening portions where the central flange connects to the vehicle structure. These recesses create localized deformation zones with different mechanical properties compared to the rest of the beam. The recesses have varying depths and cross-sectional areas that are optimized to control deformation behavior locally without compromising the overall structural integrity of the beam.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The transverse recesses are pre-formed features in the central flange before collision occurs. These recesses prepare predetermined deformation paths and stress distribution patterns that guide how the fastening portions will deform during impact. By pre-configuring the geometry of these recesses, the beam is ready to absorb energy through controlled deformation rather than unpredictable failure modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the fastening portions are made more robust to prevent deformation, then reliability is improved, but energy absorption deteriorates due to restricted deformation capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefastening portion stabilityVSAvoidenergy absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a distinction between local deformation zones (the transverse recesses) and the surrounding robust structure. The recesses are designed with specific geometric characteristics that allow controlled deformation, while the rest of the fastening portions maintain their structural integrity. This local differentiation enables the fastening portions to be both reliable and energy-absorbing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potentially harmful uncontrolled deformation of fastening portions into a beneficial controlled deformation mechanism. By introducing transverse recesses, the deformation that would otherwise be unfavorable is redirected into predetermined paths that enhance energy absorption. The harmful effect of deformation is transformed into a useful energy dissipation mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Loss of energy

If transverse recesses extend deeper along the webs to improve deformation control, then energy absorption is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorptionVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the geometric parameters of the transverse recesses, specifically limiting their extension along the webs to a maximum of one-third of the web extent. This parameter optimization balances the competing requirements of energy absorption and manufacturing simplicity. The recesses have varying depths and cross-sectional areas that are carefully controlled to achieve the desired deformation behavior without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design improves energy absorption by delaying the onset of deformation and ensuring controlled deformation, effectively addressing both frontal and offset collisions, while maintaining structural integrity under high forces.

Implementation Method 1

The central flange has, at the beam's fastening portions, transverse recesses which continue along the webs for a maximum of one-third of the extent of the webs in the transverse direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStress concentration:

Implementation Method 2

the beam cannot give way elastically in the same way as it can between the fastening portions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8246090B2Bumper beam
Publication Date: 2012.08.21 GESTAMP HARDTECH AB
  • US8246090B2 patent drawing
  • US8246090B2 patent drawing
  • US8246090B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bumper beam has an open hat beam profile with a central flange (11), two webs (12, 13) and two side flanges (14, 15), and it has two fastening portions (16, 17) in which the central flange has transverse recesses (30, 31), which continue along the webs for a maximum of 40% of the extent of the webs in the transverse direction. These recesses strengthen the profile and provide controlled deformation in response to collision loading.