Cage Mill Seed Destruction in Harvesting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for weed and volunteer grain seed control in crop farming, such as ploughing and herbicides, are inefficient and pose environmental concerns, particularly regarding herbicide resistance and soil damage.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus using a cage mill to fragment crop residue material during harvesting, destroying unwanted seeds by conveying it through a milling zone with counter-rotating rotors and airflow, and returning the fragmented material to the ground to prevent seed germination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ploughing is used for weed control, then weed and volunteer seed destruction is achieved, but soil structure is damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed control effectivenessVSAvoidsoil damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional ploughing mechanical system with a cage mill mechanical system that uses rotating bars to shred crop residue and destroy seeds through mechanical impact and shear forces, eliminating the need to turn over soil while achieving equivalent weed control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the seed destruction function from the soil disturbance process by using a separate cage mill apparatus that processes only the crop residue stream, separating the weed control objective from the harmful soil mechanical disruption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If herbicides are used for weed control, then weed management is simplified, but herbicide resistance develops and environmental concerns increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed control simplicityVSAvoidlong-term weed control effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes chemical herbicide application with a mechanical cage mill system that physically destroys seeds through shredding and impact forces, providing a non-chemical alternative that maintains operational simplicity while preventing resistance development

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the previously harmful practice of leaving intact crop residue (which protects viable seeds) into a beneficial process by using that same residue stream as the feed material for the cage mill, where the mechanical energy applied to process the residue simultaneously destroys the embedded seeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Quantity of substance

If crop residue is returned to ground without processing, then soil organic matter is maintained, but weed and volunteer seeds germinate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoil organic matterVSAvoidweed seed control
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cage mill extracts and destroys the seed component from the crop residue stream while leaving the organic matter components (straw, chaff) intact for return to soil, separating the harmful seed fraction from the beneficial organic matter fraction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies localized mechanical destruction only to the seed-containing portions of crop residue through the cage mill processing zone, while the processed residue maintains its overall organic matter quality and composition for beneficial soil incorporation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If cage mill is used for seed destruction, then weed control effectiveness increases, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseed destruction efficacyVSAvoidcage mill energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cage mill applies mechanical energy selectively and partially - only to the extent necessary to destroy seeds within the crop residue stream, rather than processing the entire residue mass excessively, optimizing energy input to achieve the minimum required destruction efficacy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The rotating bars in the cage mill deliver periodic impact forces to the passing crop residue, creating pulsed mechanical action that is more energy-efficient than continuous compression or grinding, allowing energy input to be synchronized with the passage of seed-containing material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Achieves effective and efficient weed and volunteer seed control with high energy efficiency and reduced herbicide use, potentially reaching 98% seed destruction efficacy.

Implementation Method 1

at least one vane provided on the at least one rotor... the vane comprises an element presenting a broad face to oncoming air to generate air flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAirflow generation:

Implementation Method 2

the rotor means comprises a first rotor and a second rotor, the second rotor being arranged downstream of the first rotor in the direction of airflow... each rotor comprising a plurality of impact elements arranged in circular concentric arrays

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag force: Drag

Implementation Method 3

each rotor comprising a plurality of impact elements arranged in circular concentric arrays... the first and second rotors are arranged for counter rotation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Implementation Method 4

the rotor means performs a milling operation on crop residue material delivered to the milling zone through the inlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear force:

Data Source

PatentUS8152610B2Weed and volunteer crop seed destruction
Publication Date: 2012.04.10 GRAINS RES & DEV CORP
  • US8152610B2 patent drawing
  • US8152610B2 patent drawing
  • US8152610B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of harvesting crop material includes gathering the crop material and separating chaff material, and subjecting the chaff material to fragmentation in a cage mill to destroy unwanted seed material contained therein. Also provided is a mobile agricultural apparatus which travels with a harvesting machine during a harvesting operation to receive chaff material produced during the harvesting operation. At least one cage mill having rotors for fragmentation of the chaff material is included with the mobile apparatus, to destroy unwanted seed material contained therein. Such a cage mill includes at least a casing defining a milling zone, a rotor for performing milling, an inlet for introducing material for reduction into the milling zone, an outlet for removal of material from the milling zone, and an airflow through the milling zone to assist movement of the material through the milling zone from the inlet to the outlet.