Camera Scanning System Optimization for Robotic Item Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional approaches for deploying camera devices for item identification in facilities are complex, time-consuming, and resource-intensive, often resulting in inefficient placement and configuration that can lead to high rates of mis-identification.

Innovation Solution

The optimization component evaluates various parameters of a camera-based scanning system, including image sensor, lens, illumination, and workcell parameters, to determine the optimal deployment and configuration of camera devices, minimizing the number of devices needed to achieve a target scan volume with high reading accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional approaches are used for deploying camera devices, then item identification can be performed, but the deployment process becomes complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem identification accuracyVSAvoiddeployment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters such as camera placement locations, orientations, and field-of-view angles to optimize scanning performance. By adjusting these parameters systematically, the patent achieves reliable item identification while simplifying the deployment process through automated parameter optimization rather than manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis to determine optimal camera deployment parameters before actual deployment. This includes pre-calculating placement locations, orientations, and field-of-view configurations to ensure accurate item identification from the start, avoiding complex adjustments during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If more camera devices are deployed to improve scanning coverage, then reading accuracy increases, but resource consumption and system cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebarcode reading accuracyVSAvoidnumber of camera devices
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Each camera device is configured to perform multiple functions by optimizing its field-of-view and placement to scan multiple items simultaneously. This multi-functionality allows fewer cameras to achieve the same reading accuracy that would otherwise require more devices, reducing resource consumption while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from considering only the number of cameras to optimizing three-dimensional parameters including placement height, horizontal position, and rotation angles. By utilizing spatial dimensions effectively, the patent achieves comprehensive scanning coverage with minimal devices, improving reading accuracy without increasing quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Area of stationary object

If camera devices are placed to cover maximum area, then scanning coverage improves, but identification accuracy decreases due to suboptimal positioning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan coverage areaVSAvoiditem identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniform camera placement, the system applies local quality optimization by positioning each camera at specific locations and orientations tailored to the local scanning requirements. This ensures that each camera operates at optimal quality for its specific position, maintaining high identification accuracy across the entire coverage area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts camera parameters such as field-of-view angles, focal lengths, and placement positions based on real-time scanning requirements and item locations. This dynamic optimization ensures that coverage area and identification accuracy are simultaneously maximized by adapting to changing conditions rather than using fixed suboptimal configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12272100B1Sensor optimization for robotic manipulations
Publication Date: 2025.04.08 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12272100B1 patent drawing
  • US12272100B1 patent drawing
  • US12272100B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and techniques for optimizing deployment of a camera scanning system in an environment for item identification are described. An example technique involves obtaining a first set of parameters of the camera scanning system and obtaining a second set of parameters of the environment. A third set of parameters of a predicted scan volume of the camera scanning system are determined based on the first set of parameters and the second set of parameters. At least one of the first or second sets of parameters is modified upon determining that the predicted scan volume satisfies a first predetermined condition. An indication of at least one of the first, second, or third sets of parameters is transmitted upon determining that the predicted scan volume satisfies a second predetermined condition.