Capacitive Hover Sensing for Sterile Surgical Robot Repositioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surgical robotic system components, such as manipulators and tables, are difficult to move smoothly and safely within an operating arena while maintaining sterility, as manual handling can cause draping issues, injuries, and jagged movements due to varying friction and inertia.

Innovation Solution

A capacitive hover sensing assembly is integrated into the surgical robotic system components, allowing for touch-free control through capacitive pads that detect hand gestures to automatically move the components without direct physical contact, ensuring smooth and continuous motion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual handling is used to move surgical robotic components, then the components can be repositioned, but sterility is compromised due to drape tearing and physical contact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent repositioningVSAvoidsterility maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical handling with an automated mechanical system. The robotic manipulator uses motors and actuators to move components automatically, eliminating the need for manual contact with the surgical field. This substitution allows repositioning while maintaining sterility, as the automated system can be controlled from outside the sterile boundary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automated control system as an intermediary between the operator and the surgical robotic components. The operator issues commands from a control station, and the automated system executes the movements, acting as a mediator that eliminates direct physical contact between the operator's hands and the sterile surgical field, thereby maintaining sterility while enabling component repositioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If manual force is applied to move surgical robotic manipulators, then the components can be repositioned, but the movement becomes jagged and discontinuous due to varying friction and inertia

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent repositioningVSAvoidmovement smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical pushing/pulling with an automated motorized system. The robotic manipulator uses controlled motor torque and velocity commands to achieve smooth, continuous movement. This eliminates the jagged motion caused by manual force application, as the automated system can precisely control acceleration, deceleration, and constant velocity phases of movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control where sensors monitor the actual position and movement of the robotic manipulator, and the control system adjusts motor commands in real-time to maintain smooth motion. This closed-loop control compensates for varying friction and inertia, ensuring continuous and smooth movement regardless of the manipulator's configuration or load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If manual handling is used to reconfigure surgical robotic arms, then the components can be deployed, but user safety is compromised due to pinching injuries between links

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanipulator deploymentVSAvoiduser injury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual manipulation of the robotic arm links with automated motorized actuation. The deployment and reconfiguration of the manipulator is performed by motors and actuators rather than human hands, completely eliminating the risk of pinching injuries between links while maintaining the ability to deploy and reposition the surgical robotic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If surgical robotic components are covered with drapes to maintain sterility, then sterility is preserved, but manual handling becomes difficult due to reduced grip and increased friction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesterility maintenanceVSAvoidmanual repositioning
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual handling of draped components with an automated robotic system. Since the manipulator itself is the robotic system, it can move its own segments and reposition itself without requiring external manual manipulation. This eliminates the problem of difficult gripping through drapes, as no manual contact with the draped components is needed for repositioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables ergonomic and safe movement of surgical robotic components by allowing operators to control them without physical contact, maintaining sterility and achieving smooth, continuous trajectories.

Implementation Method 1

A capacitive hover sensing assembly is integrated into the surgical robotic system components, allowing for touch-free control through capacitive pads that detect hand gestures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitive sensing: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentEP3972514B1Sensors for touch-free control of surgical robotic systems
Publication Date: 2025.11.12 VERB SURGICAL INC
  • EP3972514B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3972514B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3972514B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A control system for surgical robots based on proximity sensing, the control system including a proximity sensor coupled to a component of a surgical robot, the surgical robot component including a table, robotic arms coupled to the table, and surgical tools mounted on the robotic arms, the proximity sensor configured to sense a movement of a nearby controlling object in one or more degrees of freedom; and a processor configured to drive the component of the surgical robot to follow the movement of the controlling object.