Capacitor-Based Power-Up Control for Safe Rail Discharge

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Power management systems, such as PMICs, often fail to properly manage power-up and power-down operations in corner case events like battery loss or quick power changes, leading to systems becoming unusable due to undischarged voltage rails and bulk capacitors.

Innovation Solution

A power management system that includes a capacitor, control logic to determine a wait time by comparing the capacitor's voltage to a threshold, and a control circuit to charge, discharge, and provide voltage, ensuring voltage rails are fully discharged before initiating a startup sequence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the power management system initiates startup immediately after power-up, then the startup speed is improved, but the voltage rails may not be fully discharged leading to system failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestartup speedVSAvoidpower management reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a preliminary discharge of the capacitor before initiating the startup sequence. The control logic monitors the capacitor voltage and only allows startup to proceed after the capacitor has been discharged below a threshold voltage, ensuring that voltage rails are fully discharged before power-up operations begin.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control logic continuously monitors the capacitor voltage and uses this feedback to determine when the discharge is complete. The system compares the capacitor voltage against a threshold and only initiates startup when the voltage indicates sufficient discharge, creating a closed-loop control mechanism that ensures reliability before speed optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system implements a wait time to ensure proper discharge, then the reliability is improved, but the startup time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower management reliabilityVSAvoidstartup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a dynamic wait time that adapts based on the actual discharge rate of the capacitor. Rather than using a fixed timeout period, the control logic continuously monitors voltage and adjusts the wait duration to match the actual discharge characteristics, minimizing unnecessary delays while ensuring complete discharge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The capacitor's discharge characteristics themselves provide the timing information needed. The system uses the capacitor's own voltage decay as the timing mechanism, eliminating the need for external timing circuits or fixed delays. The discharge process serves both the functional purpose of clearing voltage rails and the timing purpose of determining when startup is safe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If the power management system does not monitor capacitor voltage, then the device complexity is reduced, but the system may become unusable in corner cases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol circuit complexityVSAvoidsystem usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control logic performs multiple functions: it monitors capacitor voltage, determines discharge completion, and triggers the startup sequence. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be separate circuits into a single control unit, managing to add monitoring capability without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The capacitor voltage serves as an intermediary signal that indicates the discharge state of the voltage rails. By monitoring this single voltage parameter, the system indirectly monitors the state of multiple voltage rails without needing separate sensing circuits for each, reducing the complexity of the monitoring system while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution prevents systems from becoming unusable by ensuring voltage rails and bulk capacitors are properly discharged, improving power management efficiency and performance, especially in corner case events.

Implementation Method 1

a capacitor, control logic configured to determine a wait time in response to a comparison of a voltage of the capacitor to a threshold voltage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS12001257B2Power management system with capacitor
Publication Date: 2024.06.04 NXP USA INC
  • US12001257B2 patent drawing
  • US12001257B2 patent drawing
  • US12001257B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A power management system includes a capacitor, control logic configured to determine a wait time in response to a comparison of a voltage of the capacitor to a threshold voltage and to initiate a startup upon expiration of the wait time, and a control circuit configured to charge the capacitor, discharge the capacitor, and provide the voltage of the capacitor to the control logic.