Caster Cam Mechanism for Low-Force Braking and Directional Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing caster systems for patient support apparatuses in hospitals and nursery facilities face issues with excessive force requirements for braking and directional control, leading to potential harm, insufficient locking, and increased noise levels.

Innovation Solution

An actuating mechanism for casters that integrates both braking and directional locking mechanisms into a standard pin, utilizing a cam mechanism with multiple switch mechanisms to minimize force exertion and optimize position control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a standard caster system is used for patient support apparatuses, then the caster can rotate around horizontal and vertical axes to move the bed, but excessive force is required for braking and directional control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking forceVSAvoidforce required
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the braking mechanism and directional locking mechanism into a single integrated cam mechanism located in the pin of the caster. This unified mechanism allows both braking and directional control to be actuated by a single pedal, reducing the force required compared to separate systems and resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and force requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cam mechanism in the pin serves multiple functions simultaneously: it controls braking, directional locking, and position indication. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate mechanisms for each function, reducing overall system complexity and the force required for actuation, thereby improving ease of operation while managing force requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If individual locking systems are installed at each caster, then braking and directional control are achieved, but the structure becomes complex and space-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking capabilityVSAvoidcaster structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple locking functions (braking and directional control) into a single cam mechanism within the pin, eliminating the need for separate locking systems at each caster. This consolidation maintains reliable locking capability while significantly reducing structural complexity and saving space within the caster assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cam mechanism is nested within the pin structure of the caster, with multiple functional components arranged concentrically or in compact layers. This nesting approach allows the complex multi-function mechanism to be housed within the existing pin space, maintaining reliability while minimizing structural complexity and space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Productivity

If a centralized braking system is used, then all casters can be braked at once, but the system requires additional components increasing weight and cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking efficiencyVSAvoidcaster weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cam mechanism in each caster pin provides multi-functionality, including braking capability. While each caster has its own mechanism, the design is so compact and integrated that it avoids the need for heavy centralized braking components, maintaining productivity through reliable braking while minimizing weight increase compared to traditional centralized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Strength

If metal components are used for durability, then strength is improved, but noise level increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent strengthVSAvoidnoise level
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite material construction, combining metal components for structural strength with plastic components for noise reduction. Specifically, the cam mechanism and surrounding components utilize plastic materials that provide sufficient strength while significantly decreasing noise generation during operation, thus resolving the contradiction between strength and noise level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution simplifies the caster structure, reduces the total height of the caster, and decreases the noise level by allowing components to be made from plastic materials, while enabling effective braking and directional control with minimal force.

Implementation Method 1

a cam mechanism (6) with a cam for position of actuating pedal (6a), a cam for direction of caster (6b) and a cam for braking the caster and of vertical brake of caster (6c)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Implementation Method 2

A spring member (25) under yoke does not develop sufficient force to brake the brake drum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 3

the brake band (20) shrinks around the brake drum (18) which brakes the caster with two-way band brake (17)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12285975B2Actuating mechanism for a caster
Publication Date: 2025.04.29 LINET SPOL
  • US12285975B2 patent drawing
  • US12285975B2 patent drawing
  • US12285975B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An actuating mechanism for a caster that brakes and positions the caster by means of a cam mechanism that enables braking of the caster using minimum forces developed on the brake lever or brake rod. The mechanism helps to handle casters of patient support apparatuses in hospital and nursery facilities easily, using minimum force developed by caregivers or by an electronic caster brake systems if used for braking of casters of patient support apparatuses, as well. The mechanism may produce an outstanding decrease of noise level of castors on patient support apparatuses.