CD2-Deficient CAR Tregs Conversion Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current CAR Treg cell therapies for transplantation and autoimmunity face challenges due to plasticity and inefficient trafficking, leading to potential organ rejection, as they can convert to effector T cells and be affected by T cell-depleting conditioning regimens, necessitating the development of conversion-resistant and condition-resistant CAR Tregs.

Innovation Solution

Engineering CAR Tregs to be deficient in cell-surface markers like CD2 using CRISPR technology, which not only makes them resistant to conversion and conditioning regimens but also enhances their functionality, achieved through a one-step method involving the removal or inhibition of the CD2 molecule.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If CAR Tregs are used for immunosuppression, then immune tolerance is promoted, but they can convert to effector T cells and cause organ rejection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of Treg phenotypeVSAvoidconversion to effector T cells
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the CD2 molecule from the CAR Treg cell surface through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing. By extracting this specific molecule that enables conversion to effector T cells, the Treg phenotype stability is enhanced while preventing harmful conversion events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the cellular parameter of CD2 expression by completely eliminating it through genetic deletion. This parameter change transforms the Treg cells into a CD2-negative state that resists conversion to effector T cells while maintaining immunosuppressive function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If T cell-depleting conditioning regimens are used to prepare for CAR Treg therapy, then space is created for CAR Treg engraftment, but CAR Tregs are depleted along with other T cells

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengraftment efficiency of CAR TregsVSAvoidnumber of CAR Tregs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a local quality difference by making CAR Tregs CD2-negative while leaving other T cells intact. This selective modification allows the conditioning regimen to deplete CD2-positive endogenous T cells while sparing the engineered CD2-negative CAR Tregs, enabling their preferential engraftment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of making CAR Tregs resistant to conditioning through overexpression of protective molecules, the patent inverts the approach by completely removing the CD2 target that conditioning regimens attack. This inversion makes CAR Tregs invisible to anti-CD2 conditioning while other T cells remain vulnerable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If multiple engineering steps are used to create conversion-resistant CAR Tregs, then stability is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion resistanceVSAvoidnumber of engineering steps
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves conversion resistance through a single extraction operation: removing the CD2 molecule via CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. This single-step approach eliminates the need for multiple sequential engineering operations while achieving the desired conversion-resistant phenotype.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The single CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing step simultaneously achieves multiple objectives: it removes CD2 to prevent conversion to effector T cells, creates CD2-negative status for resistance to conditioning regimens, and enables preferential engraftment. This multi-functional approach simplifies the overall engineering process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The CD2-deficient CAR Tregs demonstrate increased stability and immune suppression potency, effectively preventing conversion to effector T cells and resisting T cell-depleting conditioning, thereby improving safety and efficacy in transplantation and autoimmune disease treatment.

Implementation Method 1

A method utilizing CRISPR technology to remove a cell-surface marker, e.g., CD2 molecule, from CAR Tregs genome can be used to make CAR Tregs resistant to a T cell-depleting conditioning regimen involving an antibody

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCRISPR technology:

Data Source

PatentUS20240408201A1Conversion-resistant / condition-resistant tregs and car tregs, methods of making and methods of using
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIV IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • US20240408201A1 patent drawing
  • US20240408201A1 patent drawing
  • US20240408201A1 patent drawing

AI summary

CAR Tregs and Tregs are provided which are both conversion-resistant and condition-resistant. The Treg cells are engineered such that they are deficient in or substantially devoid of a cell-surface marker or antigen.