Wafer-Level CDM Stress Test Device for Semiconductor Reliability

Solution Overview

Problem

Semiconductor devices are vulnerable to electrostatic discharge (ESD) phenomena, particularly the Charged Device Model (CDM), which can lead to defective products due to unpredictable and destructive static electricity discharges during manufacturing, affecting product reliability and requiring effective testing methods to predict and prevent such issues.

Innovation Solution

A test device that includes a parameter extractor to extract parasitic parameters from package designs and a modeling circuit to generate simulation signals for CDM stress, allowing for pre-testing of semiconductor devices to predict and mitigate ESD-related vulnerabilities by simulating CDM stress and validating the accuracy of these simulations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If semiconductor devices are tested after fabrication to detect ESD damage, then defective products can be identified, but production time is lost and yield is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing ESD stress testing on wafer-level semiconductor devices before they are fabricated into final products. The test device applies charged device model (CDM) stress to multiple devices simultaneously on the wafer, identifying defective devices early in the manufacturing process. This allows defective devices to be detected and excluded before completion of the full fabrication process, thereby maintaining high product reliability while preserving production yield by avoiding waste of subsequent manufacturing resources on already-defective devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional post-fabrication testing methods are used to detect ESD damage, then defective products can be identified, but additional testing time and resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs ESD stress testing at the wafer level before final product fabrication, combining defect detection with the manufacturing process flow rather than adding separate post-fabrication testing steps. This preliminary testing approach identifies ESD-damaged devices early, eliminating the need for additional time-consuming post-fabrication reliability testing while maintaining product reliability through early defect exclusion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the ESD stress testing function with the wafer-level manufacturing process by integrating the test device into the fabrication workflow. Multiple devices on a single wafer are tested simultaneously using arrayed test structures, combining defect detection with the existing manufacturing timeline rather than requiring separate dedicated testing phases, thereby reducing total testing time while ensuring product reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If ESD stress testing is performed on individual devices, then accurate defect detection is achieved, but testing efficiency and throughput are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual device tests into a single wafer-level testing operation by arraying test structures across multiple devices simultaneously. The test device applies CDM stress to numerous devices in parallel on the wafer, maintaining accurate defect detection for each individual device while achieving high testing throughput by processing entire wafer arrays in one operation, thereby resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the wafer into multiple testable device regions with arrayed test structures, allowing simultaneous independent testing of multiple devices. Each device maintains its individual test integrity for accurate defect detection, while the segmented wafer-level arrangement enables parallel processing that dramatically increases testing throughput compared to sequential individual device testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The test device improves the prediction and prevention of defective products by accurately simulating CDM stress and identifying vulnerabilities at the wafer level, reducing the likelihood of ESD-related damage and enhancing product reliability through pre-fabrication circuit design validation.

Implementation Method 1

a capacitor circuit configured to perform modeling of parasitic capacitance extracted from a package design

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

a discharge circuit configured to allow capacitance stored in the capacitor circuit to be discharged to the substrate line

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic Discharge: Electrostatic Discharge

Data Source

PatentUS11355926B2Test device
Publication Date: 2022.06.07
  • US11355926B2 patent drawing
  • US11355926B2 patent drawing
  • US11355926B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A test device is disclosed. The test device includes an input/output (I/O) circuit configured to allow static electricity flowing between an input/output (I/O) pad and an internal circuit to be discharged to a power-supply line, a ground line, or a substrate line, a capacitor circuit configured to perform modeling of parasitic capacitance extracted from a package design, and a discharge circuit configured to allow capacitance stored in the capacitor circuit to be discharged to the substrate line.