Multilayer Ceramic Capacitor End Geometry for Stable Electrode Strength
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Lower-profile multilayer ceramic electronic components face challenges in maintaining mechanical strength due to varying film formation properties and thicknesses of external electrodes on different surfaces, leading to inconsistent mechanical strength and increased costs.
Innovation Solution
A multilayer ceramic electronic component design with a trapezoidal shape, where the relationship B<A is satisfied, and angles θ1 and θ2 are between 10° and 50°, allowing for uniform external electrode formation on both main and end surfaces using ink jet or sputtering, ensuring stable mechanical strength and easy soldering during mounting.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of manufacture
If different methods are used to form external electrodes on opposite main surfaces and opposite end surfaces of the ceramic body, then film formation properties and thickness of external electrodes are improved, but manufacturing precision and consistency of plating film thickness deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies homogeneity by using the same inkjet method to form external electrodes on both opposite main surfaces and opposite end surfaces of the ceramic body. This ensures uniform film formation properties and consistent thickness across all surfaces, eliminating the variability introduced by using different formation methods for different surfaces.
2Reliability
If the thickness of plating film is increased to improve film formation properties, then reliability of external electrodes is improved, but the thickness of ceramic body must be reduced further to meet dimensional standards, leading to decreased mechanical strength
Solution Approach 1:
The patent changes the parameter of plating film thickness to a controlled range of 5 μm to 20 μm, which is optimized to provide sufficient reliability and film formation properties without requiring excessive thickness that would necessitate reducing the ceramic body thickness and compromising mechanical strength.
3Adaptability or versatility
If the ceramic body thickness is reduced to meet dimensional standards with thicker plating film, then adaptability to dimensional constraints is improved, but mechanical strength of the multilayer ceramic electronic component deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent optimizes the plating film thickness parameter to 5 μm to 20 μm, which allows the ceramic body to maintain sufficient thickness for mechanical strength while still meeting dimensional standards. This parameter optimization resolves the conflict between dimensional compliance and mechanical strength.
4Ease of manufacture
If different methods are used for forming external electrodes on different surfaces, then ease of electrode formation is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies universality by using the inkjet method for forming external electrodes on all surfaces of the ceramic body, including both opposite main surfaces and opposite end surfaces. This single versatile method eliminates the need for multiple different formation processes, thereby reducing manufacturing process complexity and cost.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This design achieves stable mechanical strength, facilitates high-quality mounting, and reduces the thickness of the multilayer body within dimensional standards, enhancing reliability and moisture resistance.
Implementation Method 1
allowing for uniform external electrode formation on both main and end surfaces using ink jet or sputtering
Implementation Method 2
allowing for uniform external electrode formation on both main and end surfaces using ink jet or sputtering
Data Source
AI summary
A multilayer ceramic capacitor has a relationship of about 10°≤θ1≤about 50° and a relationship of about 10°≤θ2≤about 50°, where θ1 denotes an angle between a first end surface and a perpendicular extending from a side of a first main surface at a point of intersection of the first main surface and the first end surface, and θ2 denotes an angle between a second end surface and a perpendicular extending from a side of the first main surface at a point of intersection of the first main surface and the second end surface.


