Dynamic Master-Slave Arbitration in Charger Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Charger networks in prior art are rigid, with fixed roles of master and slave, and cannot dynamically adjust the number of chargers to optimize efficiency or speed of charge, limiting flexibility and adaptability to operational objectives.

Innovation Solution

A flexible charger network where any charger can assume the role of master, with dynamic power allocation by enabling or disabling chargers, using a CAN bus for communication, and allowing for arbitration and virtualization to appear as a single charger, enabling compatibility and adaptability in the number of chargers used.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed master and slave role assignment is used in charger networks, then the network structure is simple and stable, but the network cannot dynamically adjust the number of chargers to optimize efficiency or speed of charge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic adjustment of charger roles and numbersVSAvoidcharger network control mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic role assignment where any charger can become master through arbitration based on serial number, and chargers can be dynamically enabled or disabled during operation. This transforms the static master-slave structure into a dynamic one that adapts to changing operational requirements, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of chargers by enabling or disabling them based on efficiency targets or speed of charge objectives. The master charger can dynamically adjust which slave chargers are active, changing the effective configuration of the network without physical reconfiguration, thus achieving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If multiple chargers operate simultaneously to increase speed of charge, then charging speed improves, but power consumption increases due to overhead of each charger

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of chargeVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables or disables specific chargers based on the required power level and efficiency targets. Instead of keeping all chargers constantly active, the master dynamically activates only the necessary number of chargers to meet the current charging demand, avoiding the overhead consumption of unnecessarily active chargers while still achieving the required charging speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of energy

If chargers are dynamically enabled or disabled to optimize efficiency, then energy efficiency improves, but control and coordination complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumption efficiencyVSAvoidcharger control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The master charger performs multiple functions: it arbitrates for master role, manages slave charger assignments, enables or disables slaves based on efficiency targets, and coordinates power distribution. This multi-functionality consolidates control complexity into a single master unit rather than requiring distributed control logic in each charger, thus managing complexity while achieving energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the network virtualizes to appear as a single charger, then compatibility with external systems improves, but internal coordination complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with external systemsVSAvoidnetwork virtualization mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The master charger acts as an intermediary between the multi-charger internal network and external single-charger expecting systems. It presents a unified interface to external systems while internally coordinating multiple chargers, thus providing compatibility without requiring external systems to understand the internal complexity of having multiple chargers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9783062B2Charger network having a varying master
Publication Date: 2017.10.10 CURRENT WAYS
  • US9783062B2 patent drawing
  • US9783062B2 patent drawing
  • US9783062B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flexible charger network includes one or more chargers, each coupled to a processor, and is configured to perform the following operations: at power-up, a charger announces its presence to the network, and requests and awaits an acknowledgement by the network; and, if no acknowledgement is received from the network, that charger assumes a role of master of the network; or, if a response is received from the network, that charger acknowledges an existing master and assumes the role of slave within the network.