Method for operating a self-propelled cleaning device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cleaning devices struggle to efficiently manage cleaning operations for surfaces with low soiling levels, particularly after a prolonged user absence, as they lack adaptive mechanisms to adjust cleaning frequency and intensity based on changing soiling conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method where the cleaning device determines a total degree of soiling by comparing it with a reference level from a previous cleaning activity, adjusting cleaning parameters such as frequency and intensity, and allowing for delayed or reduced cleaning operations when soiling is low, using a detection device and control system to ensure optimal cleaning across the entire surface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cleaning devices perform intensive cleaning for each detected soiled area, then cleaning effectiveness is improved, but energy consumption and operational time increase unnecessarily for low-soiling conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning effectivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning device dynamically adjusts its cleaning parameters (intensity, frequency, duration) based on the detected soiling level. When low soiling is detected, the device reduces cleaning intensity and extends the time between cleaning cycles, rather than maintaining constant intensive cleaning. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by matching cleaning effort to actual need.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (cleaning intensity, frequency, time intervals) based on detected soiling conditions. Instead of using fixed cleaning parameters, the device modifies these parameters according to the measured soiling level, allowing effective cleaning when needed while conserving energy when soiling is minimal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If cleaning devices operate frequently to maintain cleanliness, then surface cleanliness is improved, but productivity is reduced due to unnecessary cleaning operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface cleanlinessVSAvoidcleaning efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning device uses detection devices to continuously monitor soiling levels and provides feedback to the control system. Based on this feedback, the system determines whether cleaning is actually needed, avoiding unnecessary operations. This feedback mechanism ensures cleanliness is maintained only when soiling exceeds thresholds, improving productivity by eliminating redundant cleaning cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of performing full cleaning operations every cycle, the device performs cleaning only when detection indicates it is necessary. This partial action approach maintains cleanliness when needed while avoiding excessive cleaning operations that would reduce overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If cleaning parameters are individually adjusted for each partial area, then cleaning precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the cleaning operation into a single uniform process applied to the entire surface area, rather than individually controlling each partial area. The detection data from multiple partial areas is aggregated to determine an overall soiling level, which then governs a unified cleaning operation, simplifying the control system while maintaining adequate cleaning precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cleaning device uses a universal cleaning operation that applies to the entire surface based on overall soiling assessment. Rather than requiring specialized cleaning routines for each detected soiled spot, a single multi-functional cleaning process handles the entire area, reducing control complexity while maintaining cleaning effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3440978B1Method for operating a self-propelled cleaning device
Publication Date: 2021.11.24 VORWERK & CO INTERHOLDING GMBH
  • EP3440978B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3440978B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating a cleaning device (1) that moves automatically within an environment, wherein the cleaning device (1) cleans a surface (2) according to a predetermined work plan, wherein a detection device (3) of the cleaning device (1) detects degrees of soiling of several surface sub-areas (4, 5, 6) of the surface (2), wherein a cleaning operation of the cleaning device (1) is varied depending on the detection result, wherein an overall degree of soiling of the surface (2) is determined from the degrees of soiling of several surface sub-areas (4, 5, 6) and the cleaning operation is carried out with the same cleaning parameters for the entire surface (2) according to the overall degree of soiling.In order to create an alternative to common operating procedures, it is proposed that the determined total degree of soiling be compared with at least one reference degree of soiling, namely a total degree of soiling determined during a previous cleaning activity.