Automatic cleaning device control method and apparatus, and medium and electronic device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ground sweeping robots often get stuck on long-pile carpets, leading to operational failures due to increased resistance and potential damage, as existing technologies lack effective methods to detect and mitigate such situations in real-time.

Innovation Solution

The method involves acquiring data on the current state of the walking wheel and machine body of the automatic cleaning device during cleaning, determining if it's trapped by comparing theoretical and actual data, and activating an accelerated-escape mode to extricate itself, utilizing sensors like gyroscopes, motor power sensors, and cliff sensors to differentiate between slipping and static conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the ground sweeping robot continues cleaning on long-pile carpets without detection mechanism, then cleaning operation continues, but the robot gets stuck and ceases to function normally

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring motor current, wheel rotation speed, and comparing actual position with expected position. When discrepancies exceed thresholds, the system triggers escape maneuvers. This closed-loop feedback enables reliable detection of trapped conditions without requiring complex external sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The robot uses its own operational parameters (motor current, wheel rotation, position data) to detect trapped conditions. Rather than adding separate detection devices, the system leverages existing operational data to identify when it is stuck on long-pile carpets, enabling self-diagnosis and self-rescue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If the robot activates accelerated-escape mode frequently to prevent getting stuck, then operational reliability improves, but device wear and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies escape maneuvers selectively rather than continuously. It monitors multiple parameters (motor current, wheel speed, position discrepancy) and only triggers accelerated-escape mode when trapped conditions are confirmed. This partial action approach prevents unnecessary energy expenditure while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection and confirmation before activating escape mode. It compares actual position with expected position over time, and only triggers escape when discrepancies persist beyond thresholds. This preliminary verification prevents premature or unnecessary escape maneuvers, conserving energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If the robot uses simple trapping detection based on single parameter, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision is insufficient leading to misjudgment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection system complexityVSAvoidtrapping detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into multiple independent monitoring components: motor current monitoring, wheel rotation speed monitoring, position discrepancy calculation, and threshold comparison. Each segment handles a specific aspect of trapped condition detection, improving overall precision without requiring a single complex detection mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses existing operational parameters for multiple purposes: motor current serves both power control and trapped condition detection; wheel rotation data serves both navigation and trapping detection; position data serves both path following and trapped condition identification. This multi-functionality improves detection precision without adding dedicated sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240115100A1Automatic cleaning device control method and apparatus, and medium and electronic device
Publication Date: 2024.04.11 BEIJING ROBOROCK INNOVATION TECH CO LTD
  • US20240115100A1 patent drawing
  • US20240115100A1 patent drawing
  • US20240115100A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automatic cleaning device control method, an automatic cleaning device control apparatus, a computer-readable storage medium and an electronic device are provided. The method includes: acquiring first data based on current state data of a walking wheel of the automatic cleaning device and second data based on current state data of a machine body of the automatic cleaning device when the automatic cleaning device performs cleaning; determining, based on the first data and the second data, whether the automatic cleaning device is trapped or not and controlling the automatic cleaning device to enter an accelerated-escape mode in response to that the automatic cleaning device is trapped.