Closure Structure Inspection for Capping Machines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing capping machines and inspection systems for packages with pre-applied closure structures are in need of improvements to ensure accurate and cost-effective application of caps, particularly in ensuring the correct positioning and shape of closure structures on packages containing pourable products.

Innovation Solution

An inspection system and method that utilizes imaging devices, such as 2D or 3D cameras, to analyze the shape and position of pre-applied closure structures on packages, calculating deviations from nominal shapes and positions, and adjusting cap application accordingly to prevent faulty installations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional inspection methods are used for closure structures, then the capping machine can operate continuously, but the positioning accuracy and shape verification of closure structures are insufficient leading to faulty cap applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection accuracyVSAvoidcapping speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system performs preliminary verification of closure structures (position, shape, orientation) before the capping operation. The imaging device captures images and the control unit analyzes whether closure structures are correctly formed and positioned prior to cap application, preventing faulty installations while maintaining continuous production flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection system provides real-time feedback to the capping machine control unit. When non-nominal closure structures are detected, the system generates signals to adjust or skip problematic packages, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains both inspection accuracy and production productivity through dynamic adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If caps are applied to all packages without inspection, then production speed is maintained, but waste increases due to faulty cap applications on packages with incorrect closure structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidcap waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary inspection of closure structures before cap application decisions are made. By verifying closure structure correctness in advance, the system identifies packages that should not receive caps, preventing waste of caps and materials on defective packages while maintaining continuous production flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection system enables selective discarding of packages with non-nominal closure structures before they enter the capping process. The control unit generates discard signals for defective packages, preventing cap application on unsalvageable packages and reducing waste of caps, packaging materials, and production time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Productivity

If no inspection system is used, then the capping machine operates without interruptions, but stress and damage occur on both packages and capping machine components due to misaligned closure structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine utilizationVSAvoidmachine and package integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system performs preliminary verification of closure structure alignment and geometry before the capping operation. By identifying misaligned or deformed closure structures in advance, the system prevents mechanical stress and damage to both packages and capping machine components that would occur during forced cap application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection system provides beforehand detection of potentially problematic packages, allowing the control unit to prepare appropriate responses (adjustment, skipping, or discard signals) before the capping operation occurs. This preventive approach cushiones against potential damage to packages and machine components by avoiding forced operations on defective packages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentEP4575472A1Inspection system for a capping machine and method for inspecting closure structures pre-applied on packages containing a pourable product
Publication Date: 2025.06.25 TETRA LAVAL HOLDINGS & FINANCE SA
  • EP4575472A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4575472A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3A
  • EP4575472A1 patent drawingFigure 3B~3C

AI summary

There is described an inspection system (14) for a capping machine (13) configured to apply caps (6) onto packages (2) containing a pourable product and each provided with a respective closure structure (5) comprising at least a collar (5a) pre-applied at a respective main wall (2b) of the package (2) and adapted to receive one said cap (6), the inspection system (14) being configured to sequentially inspect the closure structures (5) and comprising: - an imaging device (15) configured to acquire at least one image (16) per package of an inspection area (17) of the package (2), the inspection area (17) including at least the collar (5a); and - a control unit configured to analyze each acquired image (16) for determining a shape of the collar (5a) from said acquired image (16); wherein the control unit is configured to calculate a deviation of the determined shape of the collar (5a) from a nominal reference shape of the collar (5a).