Co-current Coolant Flow in Ethane ODH Reactors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane processes, the formation of 'hot-spots' in multitubular fixed-bed reactors poses a risk of reactor runaway, and existing solutions to mitigate this, such as reducing tube diameter or operating at lower productivity, are costly and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

Supplying coolant to the reactor's interior shell space in a co-current flow pattern at a low enough rate to allow a 5°C to 30°C temperature increase, thereby minimizing hot-spots without reducing tube diameter or increasing length, and maintaining isothermal conditions on the process side.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If tube diameter is reduced to increase heat transfer rate, then hot-spot formation is reduced, but reactor construction cost increases and catalyst loading time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature uniformityVSAvoidreactor construction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the coolant flow pattern parameter from conventional counter-current to co-current flow, and optimizes the coolant flow rate to achieve uniform temperature distribution without modifying tube dimensions or reactor structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adopts the coolant flow pattern configuration from WO 2001/85333, applying the co-current flow arrangement to achieve thermal management in the oxidative dehydrogenation reactor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Temperature

If tube length is increased to improve heat transfer, then hot-spot formation is reduced, but pressure drop across the reactor increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature uniformityVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the coolant flow rate parameter to optimize heat transfer efficiency, achieving uniform temperature distribution without increasing tube length or accepting higher pressure drops

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If productivity is reduced to avoid hot-spots, then reactor runaway risk is reduced, but ethylene yield decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor safetyVSAvoidethylene yield
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements thermal feedback control through co-current coolant flow, where the coolant temperature adjusts automatically along the reactor length to match the exothermic reaction profile, maintaining safe operating conditions at high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the coolant flow rate parameter to achieve the optimal balance between heat removal efficiency and productivity, allowing high ethylene yield while preventing hot-spot formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Temperature

If catalyst is diluted with inert substance to operate at lower productivity, then hot-spot formation is reduced, but cost increases and catalyst recovery becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature uniformityVSAvoidcatalyst concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the coolant flow rate parameter to control temperature uniformity, eliminating the need for catalyst dilution and maintaining high catalyst concentration for efficient and economical operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively prevents or minimizes the risk of reactor runaway while maintaining high productivity, without increasing costs or complicating catalyst recovery, by ensuring a controlled temperature profile throughout the catalyst bed.

Implementation Method 1

a shell in which the tubes are contained through which coolant circulates to facilitate the removal of the reaction heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

the undesirable combustion reactions of ethane and ethylene, both of which are highly exothermic and generate carbon dioxide and/or carbon monoxide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExothermic reaction: Exothermic Reaction

Data Source

PatentEP3490962B1Oxidative dehydrogenation (ODH) of ethane
Publication Date: 2021.03.10 SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV
  • EP3490962B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3490962B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

Processes and associated reaction systems for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane are provided. In particular, a process is provided that comprises supplying a feed gas comprising ethane and oxygen to a multitubular fixed-bed reactor and allowing the ethane and oxygen to react in the presence of an oxidative dehydrogenation catalyst to yield a reactor effluent comprising ethylene; and supplying a coolant to an interior shell space of the multitubular fixed- bed reactor in a flow pattern that is co-current with the flow of the feed gas through reactor.