CO Flow Electrolyzer for High-Selectivity C2+ Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current CO2 electrolyzers suffer from low selectivity and high overpotentials at practical reaction rates, limiting the production of high-value C2+ products such as ethylene and ethanol.

Innovation Solution

A three- or two-compartment CO flow electrolyzer design with a hydrophobic porous carbon support loaded with a copper catalyst, where CO is directly fed as a reactant, enhancing C2+ selectivity and reducing overpotential by maintaining an efficient electrode-electrolyte interface for stable high-rate performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If direct CO2 electrolysis is used to produce C2+ products, then the process can directly convert CO2 to fuels and chemicals, but the selectivity is low and overpotentials are high at practical reaction rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction rateVSAvoidselectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the CO2 reduction process into two separate electrolysis steps: first converting CO2 to CO, then converting CO to C2+ products. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized independently, achieving high selectivity for C2+ products while maintaining practical reaction rates that were not achievable in direct CO2 electrolysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses CO as an intermediary substance in a cascade process where CO2 is first reduced to CO, which then serves as the reactant for C2+ product formation. This intermediary approach enables better control over reaction pathways and improves both selectivity and reaction rate compared to direct CO2-to-C2+ conversion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If CO is fed directly as reactant to increase near-surface CO concentration, then C2+ product selectivity is enhanced, but the electrode-electrolyte interface efficiency must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveC2+ selectivityVSAvoidinterface engineering
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a porous gas diffusion electrode that allows efficient transport of gaseous CO to the catalyst surface while maintaining structural integrity and electrical conductivity. The porous structure enables high CO concentration at the reaction interface, achieving 91% C2+ selectivity while preserving electrode functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a specialized local environment at the electrode-electrolyte interface with a hydrophobic porous gas diffusion layer that optimizes gas transport and reaction conditions specifically at the reaction site, while the rest of the electrode maintains its structural and electrical properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If CO2 reduction is performed in aqueous electrolytes, then the process can proceed with available electrolytes, but carbonate formation occurs and limits performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrolyte availabilityVSAvoidcarbonate formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the problematic CO2 reduction step that produces carbonate and separates it from the C2+ product formation step. By using CO as the feedstock for the second electrolysis, the harmful carbonate formation is eliminated while maintaining the use of aqueous electrolytes in the CO-to-C2+ conversion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves a 91% C2+ selectivity at a partial current density of 635 mA/cm2, significantly surpassing previous state-of-the-art performance, and demonstrates the advantages of CO reduction over CO2 reduction in expanding product diversity and improving reaction kinetics.

Implementation Method 1

electrocatalyzing carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide in the presence of one or more nucleophilic co-reactants in contact with a catalytically active material present on the working electrode, thereby forming one or more carbon-containing products electrocatalytically

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrocatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

The electrolysis of carbon dioxide (CO2) has attracted significant attention as a process to produce high-value chemicals such as ethylene and ethanol

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reduction: Electrolysis

Implementation Method 3

a hydrophobic porous carbon support is loaded with a copper catalyst and positioned between a fluid chamber and an electrolyte chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPorosity: Porosity

Implementation Method 4

maintaining an efficient electrode-electrolyte interface where gaseous reactant/products can easily transport in/out of the porous electrode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobicity: Hydrophobe

Data Source

PatentUS11959184B2Electrochemical generation of carbon-containing products from carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide
Publication Date: 2024.04.16 UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
  • US11959184B2 patent drawing
  • US11959184B2 patent drawing
  • US11959184B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a method of electroreduction with a working electrode and counter electrode. The method includes a step of electrocatalyzing carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide in the presence of one or more nucleophilic co-reactants in contact with a catalytically active material present on the working electrode, thereby forming one or more carbon-containing products electrocatalytically.