Coating Robot Programming Using Spray Pattern Data
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing methods for programming robot paths and application parameters for painting automotive body components are reliant on programmer experience, require multiple iteration steps with material consumption, or demand high computational power for simulation, neither of which is entirely satisfactory.
Innovation Solution
A method that specifies robot paths and application parameters, using real spray pattern data combined with extrapolation, and optimizes these virtually through a computer algorithm to achieve an acceptable painting result without material waste, by storing and interpolating spray pattern data in a database.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Manufacturing precision
If conventional teaching method with multiple iteration steps is used, then painting result quality can be improved, but material consumption increases and programming time is extended
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by pre-measuring and storing spray pattern data from actual spray tests before the programming process. This real spray pattern data is stored in a database and used for virtual determination of painting results, allowing optimization without material consumption. The spray pattern characteristics (width, shape, deposition rate) are determined in advance through controlled spray tests on test panels, eliminating the need for multiple iterative material tests.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses copying by creating virtual models of the painting process that replicate real-world behavior. Real spray pattern data from physical tests is used to create accurate virtual representations of coating deposition. This virtual copying allows the system to simulate and optimize painting results computationally, achieving the same optimization goal without consuming additional painting material in iterative tests.
2Manufacturing precision
If conventional teaching method is used, then painting result quality can be improved, but programming time and iteration loops increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces the mechanical trial-and-error process with a computational system. Instead of physically testing different robot paths and application parameters through multiple iteration loops, the system uses a computing unit to virtually determine painting results based on stored real spray pattern data. This substitution of mechanical testing with computational simulation dramatically reduces programming time while maintaining optimization quality.
Solution Approach 2:
The system applies self-service by automatically optimizing robot paths and application parameters without requiring repeated manual programming interventions. The computing unit autonomously processes the virtual determination of painting results and generates optimized programming data, reducing the need for programmer experience and manual iteration adjustments.
3Loss of substance
If complete simulation of painting result in computer model is used, then material consumption is reduced, but computational power requirements and modeling complexity increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies parameter changes by using actual measured spray pattern parameters from real spray tests rather than theoretical model parameters. The system stores and uses real data regarding spray pattern width, shape, and deposition rates under various application parameters. This approach simplifies the computational model by replacing complex physical modeling with empirical parameter-based calculations, reducing modeling complexity while maintaining accuracy.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses inexpensive test panels for preliminary spray pattern measurements rather than investing in complex comprehensive simulation models. The real spray pattern data obtained from these simple, disposable test panels is stored and reused for multiple programming scenarios. This approach trades the high cost and complexity of complete physical modeling for simple, low-cost empirical measurements that can be reused computationally.
4Loss of substance
If complete simulation of painting result is used, then material consumption is reduced, but computational power requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts only the essential spray pattern characteristics from physical spray tests and stores them in a database for computational use. Instead of simulating the entire complex painting process with all its physical variables, the system extracts and utilizes only the critical spray pattern parameters (deposition rate, pattern width, shape factors) that directly affect coating thickness. This extraction of essential data reduces computational power requirements while maintaining the ability to predict painting results accurately.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3~4
AI summary
The invention relates to a method for programming a software-controlled coating robot (2) for coating components, which method comprises the following steps: - specifying a robot path, which is intended to be travelled from a paint impact point of an applicator (1) guided by the coating robot (2) in coating operations; - specifying application parameters which are intended to be complied with by the applicator (1) and the coating robot (2) in production coating operations when moving along the robot path; and - virtually determining a painting outcome for the specified robot path and the specified application parameters. The invention provides the following steps for virtually determining the painting outcome: - generating production spray pattern data and/or reading production spray pattern data from a database (4) in dependence upon the specified robot path and/or the specified application parameters, wherein the production spray pattern data read reproduces a spray pattern which the applicator (1) generates in production coating operations using the specified application parameters and/or on the specified robot path; and - determining the painting outcome taking into account the production spray pattern data read from the database (4) or the spray pattern data generated. The invention also comprises a corresponding coating system.