Collision Avoidance Braking Control via Deceleration Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing collision avoidance assist systems may perform either excessive or insufficient braking due to reliance on time to contact or relative speed alone for determining when to release braking assistance, leading to inadequate collision avoidance.

Innovation Solution

A collision avoidance assist apparatus that continuously brakes over a set time determined by the vehicle's deceleration ability, ensuring the relative speed with an object ahead reaches zero, thereby preventing excessive or insufficient braking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If braking is released after maximum contact prediction time elapses, then the system avoids excessive braking time, but insufficient braking may occur leading to collision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking timeVSAvoidcollision avoidance reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control section continuously monitors the actual deceleration of the vehicle during braking and compares it with the predicted deceleration. Based on this feedback, the system adjusts the braking release timing to ensure sufficient braking duration while avoiding excessive braking time, thereby resolving the contradiction between time loss and collision avoidance reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The braking release condition is dynamically adjusted based on real-time vehicle deceleration characteristics rather than using a fixed time threshold. The system adapts the braking duration to actual vehicle performance, enabling optimal balance between minimizing braking time and ensuring sufficient collision avoidance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-generated harmful factors

If braking is released when relative speed equals zero or distance begins to widen, then the system avoids excessive braking, but insufficient braking may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexcessive brakingVSAvoidcollision avoidance reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from actual deceleration measurement to determine braking release timing, rather than relying solely on relative speed or distance thresholds. This ensures the braking continues long enough to be effective while stopping before excessive braking occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The braking release criterion transitions from static parameters (relative speed = 0, distance widening) to a dynamic parameter based on actual deceleration measurement, allowing the system to adapt to varying vehicle conditions and maintain optimal braking duration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If braking is based only on relative speed condition, then the system simplifies control logic, but insufficient braking may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol logic complexityVSAvoidbraking sufficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback from deceleration sensors to supplement the relative speed condition, creating a more reliable braking control without significantly increasing complexity. The braking releases only when both relative speed condition is met AND sufficient deceleration has been achieved

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system integrates multiple functions: relative speed monitoring, deceleration measurement, and combined condition evaluation. This multi-functional approach ensures reliable braking sufficiency while keeping the overall control logic unified and manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2835292B1Collision avoidance assist apparatus
Publication Date: 2020.02.12 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • EP2835292B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2835292B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2835292B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

There is provided a collision avoidance assist apparatus that includes an object detection sensor 11 that detects a relative speed Vr between a vehicle and an object ahead, a brake unit 20 that brakes the vehicle so as to avoid collision with the object ahead, and a control unit 30 that sets a set braking time tbd that will be taken for the relative speed Vr to reach zero based on set deceleration dd determined depending on a braking ability of the vehicle, and controls the brake unit 20 such that the braking of the vehicle is continued over the set braking time tbd.