Common Joint Design for Dexterous Robot Manipulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robotics platforms face challenges in achieving both dexterous manipulation and versatile mobility, particularly in navigating inhospitable terrain, as existing designs often compromise on stability and flexibility.

Innovation Solution

The development of a robotics platform with a common joint design incorporating an azimuth actuator, three offset elbow joints, and a cam hand assembly, equipped with a power-on-to-disengage safety brake and position sensors, allows for greater than 360-degree rotation and versatile grasping capabilities, enabling both mobility and manipulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple different joint designs are used to achieve dexterous manipulation and versatile mobility, then the robot's capability is improved, but the device complexity and maintenance difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanipulation capabilityVSAvoidjoint design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a common joint architecture that serves multiple functions. The same joint design is used across different limbs and configurations (ATHLETE with six 6-DOF limbs, LEMUR with six 4-DOF limbs), allowing the robot to perform both manipulation and mobility tasks with standardized components, thereby reducing complexity while maintaining versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple different joint designs are used to achieve dexterous manipulation and versatile mobility, then the robot's capability is improved, but the ease of repair and production cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanipulation capabilityVSAvoidmaintenance difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universality through standardized joint designs that can be repaired and maintained using the same procedures and parts across different robot configurations. The common joint architecture with consistent actuator types and sensor configurations simplifies training for maintenance personnel and reduces the variety of spare parts needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If offset actuators are used to enable greater than 360 degree rotation, then the robot's mobility is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation capabilityVSAvoidactuator configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry through offset actuator configurations that enable greater than 360-degree rotation. The actuators are positioned asymmetrically relative to the joint axis, allowing the limb to rotate through angles exceeding 360 degrees while maintaining a standardized joint design. This asymmetric arrangement resolves the contradiction by enabling enhanced mobility without requiring fundamentally different actuator types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS9981389B2Robotics platforms incorporating manipulators having common joint designs
Publication Date: 2018.05.29 CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH
  • US9981389B2 patent drawing
  • US9981389B2 patent drawing
  • US9981389B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Manipulators in accordance with various embodiments of the invention can be utilized to implement statically stable robots capable of both dexterous manipulation and versatile mobility. Manipulators in accordance with one embodiment of the invention include: an azimuth actuator; three elbow joints that each include two actuators that are offset to allow greater than 360 degree rotation of each joint; a first connecting structure that connects the azimuth actuator and a first of the three elbow joints; a second connecting structure that connects the first elbow joint and a second of the three elbow joints; a third connecting structure that connects the second elbow joint to a third of the three elbow joints; and an end-effector interface connected to the third of the three elbow joints.