Community-Based Map Update Validation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current map updating methods are inefficient and costly due to the need for frequent manual verification and updates, especially in areas with infrequent changes or low demand, leading to delayed responses to map changes and user dissatisfaction.

Innovation Solution

A community-based user involvement method where update requests are submitted by individuals, and responses from community members determine the validity and implementation of changes, allowing for more rapid and cost-effective map updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual verification and updates are performed by service staff, then map accuracy is maintained, but updating cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemap accuracyVSAvoidupdate time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables map users to automatically detect, report, and verify map changes themselves through mobile devices and community validation, eliminating the need for service staff to manually verify every change. Users capture images of map changes, submit them through the system, and other users validate the changes, creating a self-sustaining update mechanism that maintains accuracy while dramatically reducing time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where map changes are reported by users, validated by the community through voting or confirmation, and then applied to update the map. This continuous feedback mechanism ensures map accuracy is maintained through multiple layers of user verification rather than relying solely on periodic manual staff verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If service staff verify and update maps manually, then map changes are validated accurately, but resource consumption and operational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation accuracyVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system transfers the validation workload from service staff to the user community. Users themselves perform the validation by reviewing and confirming map changes submitted by other users, eliminating the need for expensive manual verification by service staff while maintaining high reliability through community consensus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal community-based validation system where any user can participate in verifying map changes, rather than requiring specialized service staff. This multi-functional approach allows the community to collectively perform the validation function that previously required dedicated personnel, reducing resource consumption while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If rapid map updates are implemented, then responsiveness to changes improves, but verification quality and accuracy may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate speedVSAvoidverification quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the verification process into multiple independent stages: initial submission by one user, community validation through voting or confirmation by multiple users, and final application to the map. This segmentation allows rapid processing at each stage while maintaining overall verification quality through the cumulative effect of multiple validation steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements multi-layered feedback mechanisms where map changes are validated by multiple community members before being applied. This distributed feedback system enables rapid updates while maintaining verification quality, as the community collectively performs the validation function that would otherwise require slow manual staff verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If community-based validation is implemented, then update cost decreases and speed increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal platform that handles multiple functions: map change detection, image capture, community validation through voting, and automatic map updating. By consolidating these functions into a single multi-functional system rather than separate processes, the patent reduces operational complexity while improving update efficiency and reducing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9459105B2Method, apparatus and computer program product for community based user involvement in map updating
Publication Date: 2016.10.04 HERE GLOBAL BV
  • US9459105B2 patent drawing
  • US9459105B2 patent drawing
  • US9459105B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for employing community based user involvement in map updating may include receiving an update request indicating a feature requested to be changed at a corresponding location on a map, determining a community associated with the update request, providing an indication of the update request to a plurality of members of the community, and providing for updating of the map according to the update request based on responses received from the members of the community. A corresponding computer program product and apparatus are also provided.