Compact robotic cleaner for hazardous environments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional tank cleaning methods are hazardous, labor-intensive, and inefficient due to the bulkiness and maneuverability issues of existing remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), which often require human operators to enter confined spaces for troubleshooting and debris removal.

Innovation Solution

A compact robotic cleaner with elongated track members and a nested cleaning head, equipped with a vacuum system and sensors, designed to navigate and clean within confined spaces, reducing the need for human intervention and improving debris removal efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If existing ROVs are used for tank cleaning, then cleaning capability is provided, but the ROVs are bulky and difficult to position and maneuver within closed containers

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemaneuverabilityVSAvoidsize
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning head is nested between the elongated track members in a compact configuration, allowing the components to be space-efficient while maintaining full functionality. This nesting arrangement enables the ROV to fit within confined tank spaces without sacrificing cleaning capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The ROV employs movable and adjustable components including the cleaning head position relative to the track members, and the pump mounting at an oblique angle. These dynamic configurations allow the system to adapt to different tank geometries and cleaning requirements, improving maneuverability within confined spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Extent of automation

If existing ROVs are used for tank cleaning, then automated cleaning is achieved, but the ROVs are susceptible to clogging due to debris within the vessel

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveautomationVSAvoidclogging susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning system is divided into distinct functional segments: the cleaning head for debris collection, the pump for debris removal, and the vacuum hose for debris transport. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function, with the pump positioned to efficiently receive and remove debris from the cleaning head, reducing clogging susceptibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vacuum hose acts as an intermediary component between the cleaning head and the pump, providing a dedicated debris transport pathway. This intermediary structure facilitates smooth debris flow from the cleaning operation to the pump, reducing the likelihood of clogging and maintaining reliable automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If existing ROVs are used for tank cleaning, then reduced costs and increased time-effectiveness are achieved, but human workers must still enter hazardous environments to troubleshoot

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime-effectivenessVSAvoidoperator exposure to hazardous environments
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The ROV is equipped with sensors and diagnostic capabilities that enable it to monitor its own operation and detect potential issues without human intervention. The system can autonomously troubleshoot and resolve minor problems, eliminating the need for human workers to enter hazardous tank environments and maintaining continuous automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The ROV incorporates sensors that provide real-time feedback on cleaning performance, debris accumulation, and system status. This feedback mechanism allows the automated system to adjust its operation and detect anomalies early, maintaining productivity while eliminating the need for human workers to enter hazardous environments for monitoring or troubleshooting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The robotic cleaner's compact size and maneuverability enable safe and efficient cleaning of tanks, reducing operator exposure to hazardous environments and minimizing clogging issues, while sensors enhance operation control and precision.

Implementation Method 1

a pump supported that generates a vacuum force for drawing the debris into the cleaning head during the cleaning operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum force: Suction

Data Source

PatentUS20240269860A1Compact robotic cleaner for hazardous environments
Publication Date: 2024.08.15 HPC IND SERVICES LLC
  • US20240269860A1 patent drawing
  • US20240269860A1 patent drawing
  • US20240269860A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic cleaner for removing material from a vessel, such as but not limited to a sumps, and storage tank, includes a chassis, elongated track members, and a cleaning head. A first elongated track member is on a first side of the chassis and a second elongated track member is on a second side of the chassis, and the elongated track members enable movement of the robotic cleaner along a surface. The cleaning head is supported by the chassis and is nested between the first and second elongated track members such that the first elongated track member and the second elongated track member overlap the cleaning head in a lateral direction. An inlet of the cleaning head may face a forward direction of the robotic cleaner.