Compensation Learning Model for Faster Press Control Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In press systems, adjusting optimal die height and control variables for processing objects is time-consuming due to the need for trial and error across various material parameters like hardness and temperature, affecting processing efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A learning device that generates a compensation amount for command values in a control system using data-driven methods like VRFT, FRIT, or ERIT, allowing for efficient learning without actual operations, using a learned model based on specific object parameters to optimize control variables without damaging the object.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If trial and error method is used to adjust control variables for different material parameters, then appropriate control values can be obtained, but the adjustment time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol variable accuracyVSAvoidadjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary learning by collecting operation data and generating teacher data in advance, building a learned model that stores the relationship between material parameters and optimal control variables. When processing new materials, the system queries the pre-built model to obtain control variables immediately, eliminating the need for time-consuming trial and error adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual copy of the control object through a learned model that replicates the relationship between material parameters and control variables. This model serves as a digital twin that can predict optimal control settings without requiring physical trial and error on the actual processing system, thus saving time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple combinations of material parameters are tested to find optimal control variables, then comprehensive learning can be achieved, but the number of required objects to be processed increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning coverageVSAvoidnumber of objects processed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses virtual copying through learned models to represent multiple material parameter combinations without requiring physical objects for each combination. The model generalizes from a limited set of actual learning objects to predict control variables for a wide range of material parameters, achieving comprehensive adaptability without proportionally increasing the number of physical objects needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves comprehensive learning coverage by varying material parameters within defined ranges during the learning phase and storing the relationships in the learned model. This allows the system to adapt to multiple parameter combinations without physically processing objects for every possible combination, as the model interpolates and extrapolates based on the learned parameter relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If actual press machine operations are performed for learning, then real control data can be collected, but the objects to be processed may be damaged or consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata authenticityVSAvoidobject damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates virtual copies of the press machine operations through a learned model that simulates the control relationships. During the learning phase, the system uses a limited number of actual objects to collect authentic operation data, then stores this data in the learned model. Subsequent learning and optimization are performed on virtual copies, eliminating further object consumption while maintaining data authenticity from the initial real measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary data collection using actual press machine operations with a minimal set of objects to establish the learned model. Once the model is built from these initial authentic measurements, all subsequent learning, optimization, and adaptation are performed virtually through the model, preventing further object damage while maintaining reliability of the control data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12051013B2Learning device, learning method, and program therefor for shorten time in generating appropriate teacher data
Publication Date: 2024.07.30 OMRON CORP
  • US12051013B2 patent drawing
  • US12051013B2 patent drawing
  • US12051013B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This learning device provides a learned model to an adjuster including the learned model learned to output a predetermined compensation amount to a controller based on parameters of an object to be processed, in a system including the controller outputting a command value obtained by compensating a target value based on a compensation amount; and a control object performing a predetermined process on the object and outputting a control variable as a response to the command value. The learning device includes: a learning part generating candidate compensation amounts based on operation data including a target value, command value and control variable, learning with the generated candidate compensation amounts and the parameters of the object as teacher data, and generating or updating the learned model; and a setting part providing, to the adjuster, the generated or updated learned model.