Compiler-Assisted Context Switching for Low-Latency Thread Preemption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing complexity of modern computer systems has led to significant overhead in context switching between threads due to the growing size and complexity of thread state, resulting in longer processing times and increased computational overhead, which is particularly problematic in time-critical applications like electronic securities trading where tight latency bounds are essential.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of compiler-assisted context switching by identifying and utilizing preferred preemption points, such as instructions like stdu and addi, to minimize the state that needs to be saved and restored during context switches, thereby reducing the computational overhead and improving efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If traditional context switching is used without compiler assistance, then thread switching can be performed, but the overhead is significant due to the large amount of thread state that must be saved and restored

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontext switching timeVSAvoidthread state complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The compiler performs preliminary analysis during code generation to identify optimal preemption points where context switching can occur with minimal state save/restore operations. By analyzing the control flow graph and instruction sequences at compile time, the compiler marks specific instructions as preferred preemption points, allowing the runtime system to perform context switches without examining the entire thread state. This preliminary action transforms a runtime complexity problem into a compile-time optimization problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention segments the thread state into two categories: state that must be saved and state that can be left unchanged. By identifying preemption points where only minimal state needs to be preserved, the system divides the context switching operation into selective save/restore of specific registers and state elements, rather than copying the entire thread state. This segmentation dramatically reduces the overhead of context switching while maintaining correctness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If preemption points are placed frequently to reduce switching overhead, then context switching efficiency improves, but the complexity of identifying optimal preemption points increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontext switching throughputVSAvoidpreemption point identification difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The compiler performs preliminary analysis during code generation to identify optimal preemption points where context switching can occur with minimal state save/restore operations. By analyzing the control flow graph and instruction sequences at compile time, the compiler marks specific instructions as preferred preemption points, allowing the runtime system to perform context switches without examining the entire thread state. This preliminary action transforms a runtime complexity problem into a compile-time optimization problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of preemption point identification from a runtime heuristic search to a compile-time deterministic analysis. By using compiler analysis of control flow graphs, data dependence information, and instruction semantics, the system transforms the identification problem into a structured optimization task where preemption points are selected based on measurable criteria such as register liveness and instruction boundaries, rather than ad hoc runtime decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the entire thread state is saved and restored during context switching, then thread correctness is maintained, but the processing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethread state correctnessVSAvoidcontext switching time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts only the essential state elements that must be preserved across context switches, separating them from the rest of the thread state. Instead of saving and restoring the complete thread state including all registers and memory, the system identifies and saves only the minimal set of state elements necessary for correct resumption at preemption points. This extraction approach maintains thread correctness while dramatically reducing the time required for context switching operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The compiler performs preliminary analysis during code generation to identify optimal preemption points where context switching can occur with minimal state save/restore operations. By analyzing the control flow graph and instruction sequences at compile time, the compiler marks specific instructions as preferred preemption points, allowing the runtime system to perform context switches without examining the entire thread state. This preliminary action transforms a runtime complexity problem into a compile-time optimization problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11204767B2Context switching locations for compiler-assisted context switching
Publication Date: 2021.12.21 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11204767B2 patent drawing
  • US11204767B2 patent drawing
  • US11204767B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Generating context switching locations for compiler-assisted context switching. A set of possible locations is determined for preferred preemption points in a set of threads based on (i) an identification of a set of candidate markers for preferred preemption points and (ii) a type of characteristic that is associated with a possible location included in the set of possible locations. A modified set of possible locations is generated in a data structure based on the type of characteristic, wherein the modified set of possible locations indicate one or more preferred preemption points in the set of threads.