Complex-Shaped Battery Pack Layout for Vehicle Envelope Fit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing battery packs for commercial vehicles face challenges in optimizing spatial utilization, weight distribution, and structural integrity while ensuring efficient installation, serviceability, and thermal management.

Innovation Solution

The battery pack design features L-shaped, double L-shaped, and stepped-profile configurations that conform to a vehicle's installation envelope, allowing mirrored battery arrangements across a longitudinal midplane, with modular components for secure mounting and adaptable thermal management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If traditional rectangular battery packs are used, then manufacturing is simple, but spatial utilization is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial utilizationVSAvoidbattery pack geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The battery pack is divided into multiple legs or modules that can be independently arranged to form complex shapes (L-shaped, U-shaped, stepped profiles). Each leg contains battery cells organized in separate sections, allowing the overall structure to conform to irregular installation envelopes while maintaining modular assembly and manufacturing simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The battery pack design extends from traditional two-dimensional rectangular layouts to three-dimensional complex geometries with multiple legs and varying heights. This dimensional expansion allows the battery system to utilize vertical space and irregular volumes within the vehicle chassis, transforming unused spaces into functional energy storage areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Volume of moving object

If battery packs are custom-shaped to fit vehicle envelopes, then spatial utilization improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation envelope conformityVSAvoidbattery pack fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The battery pack is divided into multiple legs or modules that can be independently arranged to form complex shapes (L-shaped, U-shaped, stepped profiles). Each leg contains battery cells organized in separate sections, allowing the overall structure to conform to irregular installation envelopes while maintaining modular assembly and manufacturing simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular leg design with standardized connection interfaces allows the same basic components to be configured in multiple shapes (L-shaped, U-shaped, stepped) to fit different vehicle platforms. This universal modular approach enables a single manufacturing process to produce various custom-shaped packs without requiring dedicated tooling for each geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If multiple battery packs are installed in available spaces, then energy storage capacity increases, but weight distribution becomes unbalanced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy storage capacityVSAvoidweight distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The battery pack design intentionally creates asymmetrical weight distribution within each pack by positioning the center of gravity toward the front or rear, depending on vehicle requirements. When two packs are installed mirror-image opposite each other, these asymmetrical distributions balance each other out, achieving overall vehicle weight balance while maximizing total energy storage capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The battery pack design extends from traditional two-dimensional rectangular layouts to three-dimensional complex geometries with multiple legs and varying heights. This dimensional expansion allows the battery system to utilize vertical space and irregular volumes within the vehicle chassis, transforming unused spaces into functional energy storage areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Strength

If battery packs are designed for secure mounting to frame rails, then structural integrity improves, but installation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidinstallation process
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The battery pack is pre-assembled as a complete module with all structural components, mounting features, and electrical connections integrated before delivery to the vehicle. This preliminary assembly ensures structural integrity is achieved during manufacturing under controlled conditions, while installation at the vehicle becomes a simpler process of mounting the pre-integrated module to the frame rails

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250323371A1Complex-Shaped Battery Pack
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 CUMMINS INC
  • US20250323371A1 patent drawing
  • US20250323371A1 patent drawing
  • US20250323371A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An energy storage system may include a battery bay defining an installation design envelope. In addition, the energy storage system may include a plurality of batteries, each battery including: a casing designed to protect internal components of the battery, the casing defining an outer profile with a plurality of battery legs, including a first battery leg in a first orientation and a second battery leg in a second orientation different from the first orientation, where the second battery leg extends away from the first battery leg, and a set of battery cells arranged within the casing to form the outer profile. The energy storage system may include where the outer profiles of the plurality of batteries are configured to fit within the installation design envelope, and at least two of the batteries are mirrored across a longitudinal midplane of the installation design envelope such that the first battery legs of the mirrored batteries are positioned at opposite outboard sections of the installation design envelope.