Composite Fan Blade Ply Drop Orientation for Bird Impact Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Turbine blades made of composite materials face challenges in meeting mechanical and thermal stress requirements while maintaining aerodynamic performance and weight efficiency, particularly in withstanding bird and hail impacts, leading to complex design issues.

Innovation Solution

The blade design incorporates specific ply drop line configurations, including transverse and inclined terminal portions, to enhance mechanical resistance to impacts, with optimized ply drop lines on the pressure and suction sides, and a shield covering the composite structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the number of plies is reduced towards the blade head, leading edge and trailing edge to obtain decreasing thickness, then the weight is reduced and aerodynamic performance is improved, but the mechanical resistance to bird and hail impacts deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade weightVSAvoidmechanical resistance to impacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the ply configuration specifically at the ply drop lines located in the lower region of the blade (between root and 70% blade height). The transverse portions of ply drop lines create localized reinforcement zones that provide enhanced impact resistance precisely where needed, while allowing the blade to maintain reduced thickness and weight in other regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the blade structure by dividing it into different regions with different ply configurations. The lower region (0-70% blade height) contains optimized ply drop lines with transverse portions for impact resistance, while the upper region maintains standard progressive ply reduction for weight optimization. This segmentation allows simultaneous achievement of both weight reduction and impact resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If the blade thickness is increased to improve resistance to bird and hail impacts, then the mechanical strength is improved, but the aerodynamic performance deteriorates and design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly increasing blade thickness, the patent applies localized structural modifications only at specific ply drop line positions in the lower blade region. The transverse portions create targeted reinforcement zones that provide impact resistance without requiring overall thickness increase, thereby maintaining aerodynamic performance and reducing design complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates preliminary reinforcement features during the manufacturing process by pre-positioning the transverse portions at ply drop lines. This preliminary action ensures impact resistance is built into the structure during fabrication, avoiding the need for complex post-manufacturing modifications or operational adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Strength

If the ply drop lines are configured with transverse portions extending along transverse direction, then the mechanical behavior against impacts is improved, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical behavior against impactsVSAvoidply drop line precision
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the geometric parameters of the transverse portions, specifying that they extend over at most 10% of the distance between leading and trailing edges. This parameter optimization balances the need for impact resistance with the practical constraints of manufacturing precision, ensuring that the transverse portions provide sufficient reinforcement without requiring excessively tight tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Weight of moving object

If the number of plies is reduced to optimize weight, then the weight efficiency is improved, but the blade becomes more vulnerable to impact damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade weightVSAvoidvulnerability to impact damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by maintaining higher ply density specifically at the ply drop lines in the lower blade region where impact damage is most likely to occur, while allowing ply reduction in other regions for weight optimization. The transverse portions of ply drop lines create localized zones of enhanced reliability without compromising overall weight efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250361810A1Blade with composite structure having improved ply drop orientation
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • US20250361810A1 patent drawing
  • US20250361810A1 patent drawing
  • US20250361810A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed fan blade is composed at least in part of a structure (50) made of composite material comprising a fiber reinforcement and a matrix. The fiber reinforcement includes a plurality of plies that are each formed of warp yarns and weft yarns. The warp yarns and weft yarns include incomplete yarns that each have a terminal end on the pressure side or the suction side (42). The pressure side and the suction side (42) each have at least one ply drop line (82, 83) connecting the terminal ends of the incomplete yarns of the same ply. At least one ply drop line (82) includes at least one transverse portion (90) extending generally along a transverse direction (T), including an apex portion (92). The at least one apex portion (92) extends over at most 10% of the distance between the leading edge (44) and the trailing edge (46).