Composite Housing for Mechanical Assemblies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional metal housings for mechanical assemblies face challenges in balancing enclosure and load-bearing functions, often resulting in high manufacturing costs and weight issues, while composite materials offer directional properties but are expensive and prone to corrosion when manufactured using high-performance processes.

Innovation Solution

A composite structural housing design that separates enclosure and load-bearing functions using distinct materials and processes, featuring a metal frame for primary load-bearing and a composite reinforcement component for force resistance, with a lightweight enclosure material to seal internal components from external conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a conventional metal housing is used to handle both enclosure and load-bearing functions, then structural strength is maintained, but weight increases and manufacturing costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidhousing weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The housing is divided into two distinct functional components: a load-bearing frame made of metal and an enclosure component made of composite material. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function, with the metal frame providing structural strength and the composite enclosure providing lightweight protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs a composite structure combining metal frame components with composite reinforcement components and enclosure components. This composite approach leverages the high strength-to-weight ratio of composites for the enclosure while retaining metal's superior load-bearing capabilities for the frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Weight of moving object

If hand layup process is used to manufacture composite housing, then weight is reduced and structural requirements are met, but manufacturing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehousing weightVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The housing is segmented into a metal frame (manufactured by conventional processes) and a composite enclosure (manufactured by molding or stamping). This allows the expensive hand layup process to be avoided for the enclosure portion, using instead more cost-effective composite manufacturing methods while still achieving weight reduction goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

High-performance composite construction is applied only to the load-bearing frame components where it is most needed, while the enclosure portions use more economical composite manufacturing processes. This local differentiation of material quality optimizes the balance between performance and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If metal housing is used for both enclosure and load-bearing, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidhousing weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The housing is divided into separately manufacturable components: a metal frame and a composite enclosure. This segmentation enables each component to be manufactured using processes optimized for its material and function, then assembled together, achieving weight reduction without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges two different manufacturing approaches (metal fabrication and composite molding/stamping) into a single integrated housing solution. The metal frame and composite enclosure are manufactured separately using their respective optimal processes, then combined through assembly to create the complete housing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Strength

If composite materials with controlled fiber orientation are used, then mechanical strength is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Controlled fiber orientation and high-performance composite construction are applied selectively to the metal frame components where maximum mechanical strength is required for load-bearing. The enclosure components use more economical composite processes, creating local variations in material quality that match the functional requirements of each housing portion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10252477B2Mechanical assembly housing
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US10252477B2 patent drawing
  • US10252477B2 patent drawing
  • US10252477B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus (10) that houses functional components of a mechanical assembly includes a frame component (12) formed of a first material, the frame component (12) bearing primary load, torque or pressure applied to the apparatus (10) during operation of said mechanical assembly. The housing apparatus (10) further includes a composite reinforcement component (130) for resisting forces applied to the apparatus during operation of the mechanical assembly and an enclosure component (80) formed of a second material of lower density than the first material of the frame component (12), the enclosure component (80) covering and sealing at least the functional components of the mechanical assembly from external conditions during operation of the mechanical assembly.