Constraint Controller for Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures cause significant trauma and prolonged recovery due to the need to split the sternum and open the chest cavity, and there is a lack of effective systems to constrain surgical instrument movement during robotic surgeries.

Innovation Solution

A medical robotic system with a constraint controller that limits the movement of surgical instruments based on predefined parameters, allowing for precise control and prevention of instrument contact with sensitive areas, using a telestrator screen for boundary definition and providing force feedback through handles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional open-chest CABG procedure is performed, then complete access to heart is achieved, but patient trauma and recovery time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to heartVSAvoidpatient trauma
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The surgical approach is segmented into multiple small incisions rather than one large incision. The robotic system uses separate ports for different instruments (sutures, clamps, cameras) inserted through small chest wall openings, avoiding the need to split the sternum while maintaining access to the heart.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A robotic system acts as an intermediary between the surgeon and the surgical site. The surgeon controls robotic arms from a console, and the robotic arms manipulate surgical instruments within the patient's chest, providing precise access to the heart through small incisions without direct manual manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If surgical instrument movement is unconstrained, then surgical flexibility is maintained, but risk of contact with sensitive organs increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical flexibilityVSAvoidorgan contact risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The constraint system is dynamic rather than static. Virtual boundaries are defined in 3D space around sensitive structures, and the robotic system dynamically adjusts instrument movement based on real-time position data from imaging systems, allowing flexibility within safe zones while preventing contact with prohibited areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates real-time feedback through imaging systems (fluoroscopy, ultrasound) that track instrument position and provide feedback to the constraint controller. When instruments approach virtual boundaries, the system provides haptic or visual feedback to alert the surgeon and automatically constrains further movement into prohibited zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If constraint parameters are predefined, then safety is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Virtual boundaries and constraint parameters are predefined and configured before surgery begins. The surgical site is imaged preoperatively or at the start of surgery, and 3D models with annotated safe zones and prohibited areas are created in advance, allowing the constraint system to be initialized without adding complexity during the actual surgical procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10159535B2Constraint based control in a minimally invasive surgical apparatus
Publication Date: 2018.12.25 INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS INC
  • US10159535B2 patent drawing
  • US10159535B2 patent drawing
  • US10159535B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A medical robotic system that includes a robotically controlled surgical instrument. The system includes a constraint controller that constrains the movement of the instrument based on a predetermined parameter. The parameter may be a surgical space, wherein the instrument cannot be moved into, or alternatively cannot be moved out of, the space. The surgically constrained spaced may be defined through a telestrator screen that allows a surgeon to point and click the boundaries of the space.