Context-Aware Keyboard Input Error Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Information Handling Systems (IHSs) lack effective user-customized keyboard input error correction mechanisms that adapt to contextual information, leading to inefficiencies in data entry and processing.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system and method within IHSs that monitor context information such as posture, hinge angle, user identification, and keystroke patterns to dynamically correct keyboard inputs by performing operations like transposing, adding, or replacing characters based on specific contextual states.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional keyboard input processing is used, then the system operation is simple, but the input accuracy is low due to lack of error correction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors context information (posture, hinge angle, user identification, keystroke patterns) and uses this feedback to dynamically correct keyboard inputs. The feedback loop compares expected input patterns with actual input and applies corrections based on contextual state, thereby improving input accuracy without requiring complex hardware changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-correction of keyboard inputs by automatically detecting errors based on contextual information and applying corrections without user intervention. The IHS monitors its own operational state and autonomously corrects input errors, reducing the need for external correction mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If context monitoring is added to improve correction accuracy, then the input correction precision improves, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes context information categories (posture, hinge angle, user identification, keystroke patterns) and prepares correction rules in advance. By having correction logic ready before errors occur, the system can quickly match actual inputs against pre-defined patterns without extensive real-time analysis, reducing processing time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts monitoring parameters based on contextual state. Instead of continuously monitoring all parameters at full resolution, the system selectively monitors relevant parameters based on current context (e.g., focusing on keystroke patterns when typing is detected, or hinge angle when posture changes), thereby reducing processing overhead while maintaining correction precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic correction operations are implemented, then the adaptability to different contexts improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontext adaptabilityVSAvoidcorrection mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal correction mechanism that handles multiple types of corrections (transposing, adding, removing, replacing characters) through a single integrated framework. This multi-functional approach allows the system to adapt to various contextual states and error types without requiring separate correction mechanisms for each scenario, thereby improving adaptability while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves adaptability by changing operational parameters (which correction operation to apply) based on contextual state rather than changing the underlying correction mechanism structure. The same correction framework dynamically adjusts its behavior based on monitored context information, providing versatility without proportional increases in structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11068073B2User-customized keyboard input error correction
Publication Date: 2021.07.20 DELL PROD LP
  • US11068073B2 patent drawing
  • US11068073B2 patent drawing
  • US11068073B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for providing user-customized keyboard input error correction based on contextual information are described. In some embodiments, an Information Handling System (IHS) may include a processor and a memory coupled to the processor, the memory having program instructions stored thereon that, upon execution by the processor, cause the IHS to: monitor context information; receive an input via a keyboard; and identify an error in the input, at least in part, based upon the context information.