Cooperating Manipulators for Intuitive Workpiece Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current workpiece handling systems lack intuitive and efficient methods for handling and processing workpieces, particularly heavy or deformable items, as they often require cumbersome manual control and lack coordinated multi-robot collaboration.

Innovation Solution

A workpiece handling system featuring at least two cooperating manipulators, where one manipulator is manually guided and the other is automatically controlled to mirror its movements, allowing for synchronized or mirrored operations in multiple axes, enabling intuitive handling and processing of workpieces with force and torque control, compliance control, and adaptive movement strategies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple manipulators are used to handle workpieces, then handling capability and productivity are improved, but system complexity and control difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple manipulators into a coordinated system where they work together to handle workpieces. The control device integrates the operation of multiple manipulators, allowing them to function as a unified system rather than independent units, thereby improving handling capability while managing system complexity through centralized coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control device is designed to universally control multiple manipulators with different functions. It can manage manipulators for gripping, positioning, and various processing operations, making the system versatile and adaptable to different workpiece handling tasks without requiring separate control systems for each manipulator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If manual control of manipulators is used, then operational flexibility is improved, but handling efficiency and precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidhandling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows for preliminary programming and setup of manipulator operations. Control instructions can be prepared in advance for repetitive tasks, enabling the manipulators to execute pre-planned sequences automatically. This maintains operational flexibility for complex or varying tasks while improving handling efficiency for routine operations through automated execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adapts between manual and automated operation modes. Operators can switch between direct manual control for flexible, non-routine tasks and automated programmed control for efficient, repetitive tasks. This dynamic capability allows the system to optimize handling efficiency based on the specific requirements of each operation while maintaining operational flexibility when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If automated control of manipulators is implemented, then handling precision and speed are improved, but adaptability to varying workpiece conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling precisionVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control device incorporates feedback mechanisms that allow manipulators to receive real-time information about workpiece position, orientation, and condition. This feedback enables the automated system to adjust its operations dynamically, maintaining high handling precision while adapting to varying workpiece conditions. The feedback loop allows the system to respond to actual conditions rather than relying solely on pre-programmed instructions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system can dynamically change operational parameters such as speed, position, and gripping force based on detected workpiece conditions. This allows the automated manipulators to maintain precision while adapting to variations in workpiece geometry, material properties, or positioning tolerances, thereby combining the benefits of automated precision with adaptability to varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If heavy workpieces are handled manually, then operational simplicity is maintained, but operator safety and fatigue levels worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidoperator safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The manipulators are designed to handle heavy workpieces autonomously without requiring direct manual handling by operators. The automated manipulators perform the physically demanding tasks of lifting, moving, and positioning heavy workpieces, thereby eliminating the safety risks and fatigue associated with manual handling of heavy objects while maintaining operational simplicity through intuitive control interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP2392435B1Workpiece handling system and method for manipulating workpieces by means of cooperating manipulators
Publication Date: 2020.12.23 KUKA DEUT GMBH
  • EP2392435B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2392435B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2392435B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The system has force-/torque-controlled manipulators (1a, 1b) i.e. lightweight robots, co-operating for handling workpieces (4). The manipulators are automatically controllable and/or programmable by freely programmable control devices (5a, 5b) and a control computer (7) i.e. personal computer, in three or multiple axes. One of the manipulators is arranged in a degree of freedom for a manually guided movement. The control device automatically controls the other manipulator based on the former manually guided manipulator. An independent claim is also included for a method for manipulating workpieces by cooperating manipulators.