Counter Rotating Torque Rotor for Rotary Wing Aircraft

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft torque generation systems, such as those using tail rotors or counter rotating rotors, face mechanical complexity and performance limitations, especially in low Reynolds number environments like Mars, where propellers become inefficient, and high-altitude flight is restricted due to centripetal-G loading issues.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a counter rotating torque rotor, driven by a motor, which spins in the opposite direction to the lifting rotor to generate drag torque, optimizing drag production while the lifting rotor optimizes lift production, allowing for efficient torque generation and reduced mechanical complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional tail rotor or counter rotating rotors are used to address torque imbalance, then torque balance is achieved, but mechanical complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque balanceVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the torque generation function with the main lifting rotor by using variable pitch blades that can simultaneously produce lift and counter-torque. The same rotor system performs both lifting and torque balancing functions, eliminating the need for separate tail rotors or counter-rotating rotor systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The main rotor system is designed to perform multiple functions: it generates lift for flight and simultaneously produces counter-torque to balance the torque from the propulsion system. The variable pitch mechanism allows the rotor to adapt its blade angle to fulfill both roles efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If propellers are used in low Reynolds number environments (e.g., Mars), then flight is possible, but propeller efficiency decreases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental adaptabilityVSAvoidpropeller efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs flapping motion and oscillating blade movements to enhance propeller efficiency in low Reynolds number environments. The dynamic adjustment of blade pitch and the utilization of inertial effects during flapping cycles improve thrust generation efficiency where traditional steady-state propellers fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters including blade pitch angle, rotation speed, and blade orientation to optimize performance across varying Reynolds number conditions. This allows the propeller to adapt to different atmospheric densities and maintain efficiency in both Earth and Mars environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If smaller aircraft are designed for low Reynolds number operation, then environmental adaptability improves, but aerodynamic efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelow Reynolds number operationVSAvoidaerodynamic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft is divided into functionally independent modules: a separate lifting rotor system and a torque generation system. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function - the lifting rotor for aerodynamic efficiency and the torque system for counter-balancing - thereby maintaining overall efficiency in small-scale low Reynolds number operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The aircraft employs dynamic control mechanisms including variable pitch rotors and adjustable blade configurations that allow real-time optimization of aerodynamic performance. This dynamic adaptability compensates for the inherent efficiency losses associated with small size and low Reynolds number operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Speed

If high spin rates are used to increase forward speed and high-altitude flight capability, then performance improves, but centripetal-G loading causes bearing failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforward speedVSAvoidbearing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the torque generation function from the main lifting rotor system and places it in a separate, dedicated torque rotor system. This separation allows the main lifting rotor to operate at optimized speeds for lift generation without being constrained by torque balancing requirements, thereby reducing centripetal-G loading on bearings while maintaining high forward speed capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables faster forward flight, higher altitude operations, reduced mechanical complexity, and efficient lift production, with the counter rotating torque rotor allowing for stable flight and image capture without the limitations of traditional systems.

Implementation Method 1

The motor may spin the lifting rotor in a first direction to generate lift for the apparatus

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLift generation: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

The motor may spin the torque rotor in a second direction to generate drag-torque for the apparatus

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag torque: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS10864987B2Counter rotating torque drive for rotary wing vehicle propulsion
Publication Date: 2020.12.15 AEROSPACE CORP
  • US10864987B2 patent drawing
  • US10864987B2 patent drawing
  • US10864987B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft that includes torque rotor and a lifting rotor, and generates torque from the torque rotor. The torque rotor may optimize drag production while the lifting rotor may optimize lift production limiting compromise between drag and lift production rotor.